Concealing Colonial Comparability
British Exceptionalism, Imperial Violence, and the Dynamiting of Cave Refuges in Southern Africa, 1879–1897
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11944500 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tom Menger (0000-0001-7673-9651, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 860-889 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-6534 • E-ISSN: 1743-9329 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03086534.2022.2057742 |
| OpenAlex | W4283159138 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 39 |
The 1845 Dahra Massacre, in which French troops killed hundreds of Algerians by ‘smoking out’ their cave refuges, instantly became (and remains) an emblematic case of colonial violence. In Britain, this atrocity came to stand for everything British colonialism supposedly was not, and thus buttressed the claim to British exceptionalism as having a supposedly ‘better’, less violent colonialism. And yet, such attacks on caves had featured regularly in nineteenth-century British warfare in southern Africa, smoke being supplemented by dynamite from the 1870s onwards, cumulating in the little-known but extensive cave dynamitings in MaShonaland 1896-1897. This article reconstructs that long history, describing not only how practitioners accepted the dynamitings largely unquestioned, but also asking how at the time the British claim to exceptionalism was sustained despite the more than apparent resemblances to foreign cases. Apologists of empire did not cover up the violence but rather defended it; what they chose to remain silent on were the foreign analogies – concealed comparability was key to successfully sustaining British exceptionalism. Given the continued influence of exceptionalist arguments in public debate and historiography, this article finally makes a case to more forcefully place histories of British colonial violence next to those of other empires in an explicitly transimperial framework
American exceptionalism · Ancient history · Archaeology · Colonialism · Empire · Exceptionalism · Historiography · Political science · Politics · Writ · Hispanic-African Historical Relations · History · Law · Military History and Strategy · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Revolt in Southern Rhodesia, 1896-97
Small wars
Protest and power in Black Africa.
A History of Violence in the Early Algerian Colony
Extreme Violence and the ‘British Way’
British Counterinsurgency, 1919–60
The Colonial Way of War
Emerging Memory
Imperial Endgame
White Farmers in Rhodesia, 1890–1965
The Anatomy of a South African Genocide
Naming the suffering of victims in the French conquest of Algeria
By Sword and Plow
Savage warfare’
The Other Side of the Coin
Minimum Force’
Minimum force, British Counter‐Insurgency and the Mau Mau rebellion
The British Army and the Origins of its Minimum Force Philosophy
Minimum force, British counter‐insurgency and the Mau Mau rebellion
The Siege of Makapansgat
In Defiance of the Highest Principles of Justice, Principles of Righteousness’
Delegitimating Empire
Where Does the World Historian Write From? Objectivity, Moral Conscience and the Past and Present of Imperialism
The Banality of Brutality
Histories of the hanged
The Land Belongs to Us
British counter-insurgency
Minimum force in British counterinsurgency
Another road to the Raid
Savage Warfare
French Algeria in British Imperial Thought, 1830-70
Making empire
Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man
Colonial Aphasia
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |