Under the Name of Method
On Jacques Rancière's Presumptive Tautology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11952205 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C W Bingham (0000-0002-9804-0574, Simon Fraser University, corresponding author), Charles Bingham |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 405-420 |
| Publication date | 2009-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2009.00711.x |
| OpenAlex | W2057525946 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This paper investigates the philosophical method of Jacques Rancière, with special attention to use of the ‘presumptive tautology’. It distinguishes between the Enlightenment conception of method as universally applicable technique, and the philosophical conception of method as a certain style that has been invented by a certain person. Ultimately, the paper puts the methodology of Rancière’s The Ignorant Schoolmaster under scrutiny
Art · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Literature · Scrutiny · Sociology · Style (visual arts · Tautology (logic · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2023 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |