Are the widespread scatters of stone artefacts on dune surfaces in southeastern arid Australia really late Holocene in age
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11955679 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip D Hughes (0000-0002-8284-0219, Flinders University, corresponding author), Philip Hughes (0000-0001-7928-5229, Department of Archaeology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia), Amy M Way (0000-0001-8896-1815, Geoscience and Archaeology, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia), Marjorie Sullivan (0000-0001-9856-2375, Department of Archaeology, School of Philosphical and Historical Inquiry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 75-83 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0312-2417 • E-ISSN: 2470-0363 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03122417.2020.1826625 |
| OpenAlex | W3094507990 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
Vast numbers of stone artefact clusters (commonly called artefact scatters) occur on dune surfaces throughout southeastern arid Australia, virtually all of them undated. They were interpreted by researchers in the 1980s and 1990s as being mainly of late Holocene age on the basis of their surface or near-surface locations and the composition of their assemblages, which include backed artefacts, tulas and unifacial points. In this article, we analyse dated archaeological sites in the Roxby dunefield to test the reliability of this interpretation. Our analyses indicate that we can be confident that most of the artefacts in the many thousands of other recorded but undated sites in this dunefield are of late Holocene age. Throughout the region, the post-LGM geomorphic histories of dunes in relation to their archaeological records were broadly similar, allowing us to conclude that, on the balance of probabilities, earlier researchers working throughout the southeast arid zone were correct to conclude that the sites on the surfaces of these dunes were essentially late Holocene in age. Abbreviations: BA+T+UP: backed artefacts, tulas and unifacial points combined; ENSO: El Niño Southern Oscillation; LGM: last glacial maximum; OH&S: occupational health and safety
Archaeology · Arid · Geography · Glacial period · Holocene · Last Glacial Maximum · Physical geography · Aeolian processes and effects · Geology and Paleoclimatology Research · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology · Paleontology
Pleistocene Settlement of Deserts from an Australian Perspective
Archaeology of Ancient Australia
The Archaeology of Australia's Deserts
How do longitudinal dunes respond to climate forcing? Insights from 25 years of luminescence dating of the Australian desert dunefields
Occupational disturbance and types of archaeological deposit
Pleistocene Occupation of the Arid Zone in Southeast Australia
Pleistocene Archaeology in the Flinders Range
The changing abundance of backed artefacts in south-eastern Australia
Quantifying the Size of Artefact Assemblages
Are Tulas and Enso Linked In Australia
New Pleistocene ages for backed artefact technology in Australia
Early Holocene backed artefacts from Australia
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |