Reducing Tensions in Australian Intergovernmental Relations through Institutional Innovation (关键词
(政府间协定、绩效、问责、伙伴关系 。 通过体制创新来减少澳大利亚政府间关系紧张)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11959636 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Menzies (Griffith University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 382-389 |
| Publication date | 2013-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8500.12036 |
| OpenAlex | W1831046181 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 11 |
Australia remains under‐institutionalised in structures to manage intergovernmental relations. Negotiation and agreement remain dependent on the ad hoc summitry of COAG with deliberations dominated by the ‘soft’ factors of partisanship, personality and the political cycle. This articles outlines the ‘soft’ factors which dominate intergovernmental relations and argues institutional innovation is needed to formalise the management of multi‐level governance in Australia
Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Australian History and Society · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration
The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions
Power
A 'Talent for Bureaucracy
The Malaise of Federalism
The Premiers' Conferences. An Historical Sketch From the Beginnings to 1930
Pragmatic Federalism
Blowing Hot and Cold - Intergovernmental Relations Capacity in the Commonwealth Government
Multi-level governance and the emergence of collaborative federal institutions in Australia
The Governments and Societies of Canadian Federalism
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2015 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |