Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Not yet 50/50’ – Barriers to the Progress of Senior Women in the Australian Public Service

Bibliographic Data

ID11959699
AuthorsMark Evans (0000-0002-9605-6417, University of Canberra, corresponding author), Meredith Edwards (0000-0002-2824-5208, University of Canberra), Bill Burmester (University of Canberra), Deborah C May (University of Canberra), Deborah May (University of Canberra)
Year2014
Volume73
Issue4
Pages501-510
Publication date2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-8500.12100
OpenAlexW2164336933
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited1

In most countries around the world women remain in the minority when it comes to senior positions in both the public and private sectors. That there are barriers to their progression is not in doubt. What is not well understood is the nature of those barriers and the extent to which they are consciously or unconsciously constructed. Moreover, there has been a stark absence of empirical studies in the field of Australian public administration to investigate these issues and assess the implications. The purpose of this abbreviated article is to help bridge the gap (the full study is published at https://www.wgea.gov.au/sites/default/files/not%20yet%2050%EF%80%A250%20report-Final%20Version%20for%20print(1)[1].pdf). It does this through a study of the perceptions of senior men and women of the cultural and systemic barriers affecting the recruitment, retention and promotion of senior women in six Australian Commonwealth departments. The article then proposes a range of mitigating strategies for navigating these barriers and achieving and maintaining a better gender balance at the Senior Executive Service level across the Australian Public Service. These strategies are integrated within a systems model of behavioural change which we hope will prove useful to public organizations embarking on diversity reform initiatives

Business · Commonwealth · Diversity (politics · Economics · Executive director · Management · Perception · Political science · Promotion (chess · Public relations · Public service · Service (business · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Psychology · Public Administration · Marketing

  • Pursuing diversity from the podium

    Open Access•Rachel Howley•International Journal of Music…•2021

  • Gender in Public Administration

    Open Access•George Carey, Helen Dickinson•Australian Journal of Public…•2015

  • Insights for Indigenous employment into a case study of unconscious bias in the Australian Public Service

    Open Access•Craig Leon•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2022

  • Representative bureaucracy and unconscious bias

    Open Access•Sara Akram•Public Administration•2017

  • A Gender Analysis of Women in Public–private–voluntary Sector ‘Partnerships’

    Open Access•Karen Johnston•Public Administration•2016

  • Domestic challenges and international leadership

    Elise Stephenson•Australian Journal Of International…•2019

  • Is international affairs too ‘hard’ for women? Explaining the missing women in Australia's international affairs

    Melissa Conley Tyler, Melissa H Conley Tyler et al.•Australian Journal Of International…•2014

  • Change agents or defending the status quo? How senior leaders frame workplace gender equality

    Open Access•Natasha Cortis, Meraiah Foley et al.•Gender Work and Organization•2021

  • Best person or best mix? How public sector managers understand the merit principle

    Open Access•Meraiah Foley, Rae Cooper et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2021

  • Feminism, Gender, and Power Relations in Policy – Starting a New Conversation

    Open Access•George Carey, Helen Dickinson et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2018

  • Managerial Perspectives on Implicit Bias, Affirmative Action, and Merit

    Open Access•Meraiah Foley, Sue Williamson•Public Administration Review•2018

  • The Australian Human Rights Commission

    Edward Santow•Legal Protection of Rights in…•2019

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,92
Citation span2014 - 2022 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae