In the shadow of bureaucratic governance
A framework for internal governance in government organisations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11960989 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R C Anderson (0000-0002-8299-5683, Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 499-519 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-6647 • E-ISSN: 1467-8500 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8500.70006 |
| OpenAlex | W4409778490 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 62 |
Government organisations employ various forms of governance, both externally and internally. Externally, government organisations increasingly operate within networks, while internally, bureaucratic governance is often maintained. While research has been conducted on how external network governance can be shaped, less is known about the impact of internal governance on the contribution the government organisation makes to the external network and how the internal governance structure within a government organisation can align with its external network governance. This research demonstrates that the way internal governance is structured influences the contribution that government organisations make to an external network. Internally, a bureaucratic form of governance is often combined with network or market governance. Combining bureaucratic governance with network governance provides a good basis for timely and substantively correct contributions but can also lead to a clash between these two forms of governance. The combination of bureaucratic governance and market governance provides a basis not only for timely and substantively correct contribution but also for reliable contribution to the network. Points for practitioners It can be concluded that bureaucratic governance can be effective insofar as it targets the organisational units under the primary director's responsibility. However, this internal governance form can fall short when contributions from other directorates need to be adjusted. This is especially evident in external projects realised within a network that involve contributions from multiple departments under different directors within the government organisation, as an organisation relying solely on bureaucratic governance may struggle to provide timely and appropriate support for the project. A combination of bureaucratic governance and network governance appears to be more effective, but a lack of coordination between the two can lead to internal governance conflicts. This can result in inconsistent contributions to the project by the government organisation. When internally combining bureaucratic governance with market governance, this issue seems to be less prevalent. The study demonstrates that a blend of bureaucratic and market governance leads to perceived reliability of the organisation's contribution by project participants
Bureaucracy · Business · Corporate governance · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Shadow (psychology · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Public Procurement and Policy · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Finance
Debating Governance
The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations
Managing Uncertainties in Networks
The challenge of policy coordination
Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’
The Blame Game
Reorganizing the welfare state administration
Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model
Governance Networks in the Public Sector
Governance as theory
Designing and Managing Networks
Anticipating and designing for policy effectiveness
Invisible actors
From local government to local governance
An empirical analysis of municipal efficiency and local resident satisfaction by council type in Victorian local government
Collective action and co‐production of public services as alternative politics
Participation
Public Value Management
Public Values
Rules as Institutional Context for Decision Making in Networks
Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks
Managing Networks
Government Continues to Do Its Job. A Comparative Study of Governance Shifts in the Higher Education Sector
Managing Networks in the Public Sector
Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool
The Impact of Network Management and Complexity on Multi‐level Coordination
The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks
Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks
How can local government be better supported to collaborate for community health and wellbeing
Achilles' heels of governance
Images of Coordination
Balancing Trade‐Offs between Policy Responsiveness and Effectiveness
A Preliminary Theory of Informal Accountability among Network Organizational Actors
From the Positive to the Regulatory State
The Implications for Democracy in a Networked Bureaucratic World
Principles for Controlling Agents
Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making
Network Management Reconsidered
Control, Bargains, and Cheating
Modes of Network Governance
Big Questions in Public Network Management Research
Studying Governance and Public Management
The more the better? Rule growth and policy impact from a macro perspective
Implementation failures revisited
Treating Networks Seriously
A Public Management for All Seasons
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Wicked Problems
From Max Weber
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |