Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Right to Die' by Russel Ogden

A Commentary

Bibliographic Data

ID11967305
AuthorsBruce W Wilkinson (corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume21
Issue4
Pages449-449
Publication date1995-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Public Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0317-0861 • E-ISSN: 1911-9917
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3551342
OpenAlexW2066535096
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

Russel Ogden has presented a case for legislation legalizing euthanasia, and buttressed it with a variety of supposed 'social benefits' emanating from this legalization. In the process he dismisses the concerns of opponents of euthanasia, particularly the 'slippery slope' argument which submits that once euthanasia is permitted, it will lead to involuntary euthanasia as well. And he provides a rather selective assessment of the entire aid-in-dying controversy. It is not possible in a short commentary such as this to discuss every issue that Ogden raises. I will endeavour, however, to point out a number of the grave weaknesses in his position and demonstrate that he himself has already slid down the slippery slope in his own thinking, apparently without even realizing it! His position is really quite frightening, based as it is on the view that some elite Board, appointed by the Minister of Health, and espousing the appropriate views of 'liberalism, and civil libertarianism' will have the final decision-making power over who is to live or not live. Ogden's position is even more frightening when we see the philosophy underlying it. Gone from his frame of reference is any regard for the validity of the principle of the sanctity of human life, which has undergirded our civilized society for many centuries. Instead, he rests his case on 'the principles of equality of justice, individual autonomy, and self-determination'; which he repeats three times in four pages, apparently to ensure the reader does not miss them. This is just another set of variants on the 'put yourself first,' 'please yourself,' 'if it feels good do it' philosophy that is so popular today, and yet so destructive of the very fabric of our society. It is a self-centred philosophy. And it is summarized in a paragraph on page 17 of Ogden's article, which to me is one of the saddest, most despairing paragraphs I have ever read. Let me reproduce it here so we can have another look at it

Die (integrated circuit · Ogden · Political science · Right to die · Theology · Engineering · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Materials Science · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Philosophy · Mechanical Engineering

  • Euthanasia

    Open Access•Clifton D Bryant•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2007

  • The Right to Die

    Rüssel D Ogden, Russel Ogden•Canadian Public Policy•1994

  • The Right to Die

    Rüssel D Ogden, Russel Ogden•Canadian Public Policy•1994

Citations per year0.06
Citation span1994 - 2007 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae