Eliminating Mandatory Retirement
Economics and Human Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11967464 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Morley Gunderson (0000-0002-2261-8827, corresponding author), James E Pesando |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 352-352 |
| Publication date | 1980-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0317-0861 • E-ISSN: 1911-9917 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3550004 |
| OpenAlex | W2064884556 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
The arguments in favour of banning mandatory retirement namely, to relieve the pension burden on future generations, and to guarantee the human rights of olders workers merit more critical scrutiny than they appear to have received in the current debate. Similarly, one of the arguments against banning mandatory retirement that of opening employment opportunities for youth is ambiguous theoretically and requires further empirical evidence. More attention should be paid to the possibility that mandatory retirement can be both an efficient and equitable work rule
Actuarial science · Business · Economics · Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Global Health Care Issues · Law
| Citations per year | 0.15 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1985 - 2014 (30) |
| Highly cited | No |