Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Extra-Billing and Physician Remuneration

A Paradox

Bibliographic Data

ID11967892
AuthorsHerbert C Northcott (0000-0002-7150-4412, corresponding author)
Year1982
Volume8
Issue2
Pages200-200
Publication date1982-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Public Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0317-0861 • E-ISSN: 1911-9917
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3550156
OpenAlexW1985928049
LanguageEN
References cited2

A representative survey of residents of Edmonton, Alberta found early in 1980 before the release of the Hall Report: (1) that the public was strongly opposed to extra-billing; (2) that public perceptions of physician net income were relatively accurate; and (3) that the public felt that physicians deserved a moderate increment in their 1980 incomes. These findings complement the Stoddart and Woodward study on the impact of extra-billing in Ontario and indicate public opinion support for Hall's recommendations that extra-billing be banned and that physicians be adequately compensated

Actuarial science · Business · Remuneration · Healthcare Policy and Management · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Finance

  • The Implications of Established Program Finance for National Health Insurance

    Malcolm C Brown•Canadian Public Policy•1980

  • Arbitration and the Medical Profession

    Pran Manga•Canadian Public Policy•1980

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae