Ancient Technologies
Complete vs. Conceptual Transfer
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11974635 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rafael Frankel (University of Haifa, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 39 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 115-126 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Tel Aviv (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0334-4355 • E-ISSN: 2040-4786 |
| Editorial | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1179/033443512x13226621280741 |
| OpenAlex | W1979775159 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
The article suggests that certain regional differences between ancient installations that served similar purposes can be explained as being the result of two distinct types of transfer: complete and conceptual. In complete transfer, newly-introduced installations are identical or almost identical to those of the place from which they were derived. In conceptual transfer, it is only the general concept that is transferred. As a result, in the recipient region a very different device develops.The article describes two cases of conceptual transfer: the lever-anddrum press in israel and the rotary hand mill in China. It then goes on to discuss a third case, screw weights in israel. This case not only helps to explain the unusual topographical distribution of the various types of weights but also demonstrates both types of transfer
Calculus (dental · Conceptual framework · Distribution (mathematics · Epistemology · Mathematical analysis · Mill · Transfer (computing · Computer Science · Engineering · Eurasian Exchange Networks · Linguistics and language evolution · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Geology · Mechanical Engineering
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,25 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2020 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |