The effects of specifying job requirements and using explicit warnings to decrease sex discrimination in employment interviews
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11999685 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William D Siegfried (University of North Carolina at Charlotte, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 73-82 |
| Publication date | 1982-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sex Roles (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0360-0025 • E-ISSN: 1573-2762 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00287675 |
| OpenAlex | W2045320167 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 19 |
Job interview · Sex discrimination · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Law · Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes.
The influence of sex-role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior.
Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions.
Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making.
Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations.
Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks
Unfair discrimination in the employment interview
| Citations per year | 0.03 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1993 - 1993 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |