On Methods and Marshmallows

A Roadmap for Science That Is Openly Feminist and Radically Open

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12003641
AutoresSarah J Gervai (0000-0002-2667-6370, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA, autor de correspondencia), Amanda E Baildon (0000-0001-5564-4581, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA), Tierney K Lorenz (0000-0002-4999-1584, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA)
Año2021
Volumen45
Número4
Páginas430-447
Fecha de publicación2021-08-19
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPsychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/03616843211032632
OpenAlexW3195522527
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas99

In this commentary, we argue that feminist science and open science can benefit from each other’s wisdom and critiques in service of creating systems that produce the highest quality science with the maximum potential for improving the lives of women. To do this, we offer a constructive analysis, focusing on common methods used in open science, including open materials and data, preregistration, and large sample sizes, and illuminate potential benefits and costs from a feminist science perspective. We also offer some solutions and deeper questions both for individual researchers and the feminist psychology and open science communities. By broadening our focus from a myopic prioritization of certain methodological and analytic approaches in open science, we hope to give a balanced perspective of science that emerges from each movement’s strengths and is openly feminist and radically open

Constructive · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Feminism · Open Science · Perspective (graphical · Quality (philosophy · Service (business · Sociology · Computer Science · Data Analysis and Archiving · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Gender Studies · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology