Exposure to Sexual Economics Theory Promotes a Hostile View of Heterosexual Relationships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12004792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Janell C Fetterolf (Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA), Laurie A Rudman (0000-0001-7117-0312, Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 77-88 |
| Publication date | 2016-09-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology of Women Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0361-6843 • E-ISSN: 1471-6402 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0361684316669697 |
| OpenAlex | W2524474172 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 49 |
Proponents of sexual economics theory argue that women exchange sex for men’s resources. This idea is likely to promote a competitive view of gender relationships that undermines gender equality by characterizing women as manipulative and financially dependent on men. Heterosexual college students ( N = 474) who were randomly exposed to a popular YouTube video describing sexual economics theory increased their (1) behavioral support for sexual exchange concepts, (2) endorsement of the theory, and (3) adversarial views of heterosexual relationships, compared with a control group of students. Sexual exchange theory endorsement and adversarial heterosexual beliefs positively covaried, and both attitudes were related to participants’ sexism. Reading a critique of sexual exchange theory, that emphasized mutual respect and affection as precursors to heterosexual intimacy, counteracted the consequences of exposure to the theory. The findings provide evidence that disseminating sexual exchange theory via video on the Internet negatively affects young adults’ views of gender relationships. Educators, and others who wish to explore sexual economics theory through the use of this video, should also include a discussion of the countervailing evidence available. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index
Adversarial system · Affection · Developmental psychology · Reading (process · Social exchange theory · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Psychology · Social Psychology
Feminism is for every (academic) body
Myths of Sexual Economics Theory
The Drawback of Sexual Empowerment
The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’
Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health
Statistical Discrimination and the Rationalization of Stereotypes
Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence
What Motivates the Sexual Double Standard? More Support for Male Versus Female Control Theory
MorePower 6.0 for Anova with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis
A Prospective Analysis of Sexual Assault Perpetration
Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality
Sexual Strategies Theory
Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers
A Longitudinal Examination of Male College Students' Perpetration of Sexual Assault
The Two Faces of Adam
Sexual Economics
Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth
Well… She Wants It More
Psychological predictors of sexual harassment
Adversarial Sexual Attitudes Toward Women
First- and Second-Generation Measures of Sexism, Rape Myths and Related Beliefs, and Hostility Toward Women
Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
Gender Roles and Pressure to be Truthful
The Interpersonal Power of Feminism
Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire? Reality Dating Television Programs, Attitudes Toward Sex, and Sexual Behaviors
Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female Subtypes
Talking about sex
Sexual compliance
Sex on the Brain
Truth and consequences
From Sex to Sexuality
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
The impact of socially conveyed norms on the reporting of sexual behavior and attitudes by men and women
Sexual Desire Discrepancies
Gender Differences and Similarities in Receptivity to Sexual Invitations
Becoming Friends by Chance
Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy
Let's get serious
Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance
Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers
Men and women are from Earth
Of Animals and Objects
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity
Sexual Economics, Culture, Men, and Modern Sexual Trends
Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |