How do we make ourselves heard in the writing of a research article? A study of authorial references in four disciplines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12059136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mohsen Khedri (0000-0002-9286-4230, Sohar University and University of Cyprus, corresponding author), Konstantinos Kritsis (0000-0002-8011-2138, Sohar University and University of Cyprus) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 194-217 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0726-8602 • E-ISSN: 1469-2996 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07268602.2020.1753011 |
| OpenAlex | W3036512798 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 45 |
This study examined the use of personal (exclusive first-person plural pronouns) and impersonal (abstract rhetors, periphrastic passives and it-clauses) authorial references in a corpus of 160 research articles in applied linguistics, psychology, environmental engineering and chemistry. The aim was to see if personal and impersonal authorial references, as realized by the rhetorical options chosen, are predisposed to differences across disciplinary rhetorical cultures. The results indicated disciplinary variations in both the frequency and use of personal and impersonal authorial references, especially when the disciplines were compared for contrasting effects. While the applied linguistics and psychology writers favoured the use of exclusive first-person plural pronouns to construct their authorial persona, the environmental engineering and chemistry writers preferred a more detached interpersonal style by opting predominantly for periphrastic passives. Also, the results showed differences in the incidence of use of personal and impersonal authorial references across discourse functions, which could be attributed to the adoption of different interpersonal strategies within the disciplines. The present results are expected to extend our understanding of disciplinary variations towards the use of authorial references in tandem with discourse functions in research articles in the selected disciplines, particularly in the relatively unexplored disciplines of chemistry and environmental engineering
Art · Construct (python library · Discipline · Humanities · Interpersonal communication · Linguistics · Persona · Personal pronoun · Plural · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Systemic functional linguistics · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Writing and Handwriting Education
Hedging in Scientific Research Articles
The Language of Evaluation
Evaluation in Text
Academic Voices
The medical research paper
The ‘I’ in identity
Self‐citation and self‐reference
Hooking the reader
Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles
Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing
The Use of Personal Pronouns
Genre analysis
Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles
Metadiscourse in Academic Writing
‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’
‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’
Pedagogy, pathology and ideology
Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics
Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L
Robot Kung fu’
Referencing as Persuasion
Putting Facts Together
Intercultural rhetoric research
Cotext as context
Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture; Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th century
Persuasion and context
Metadiscourse
Authority and invisibility
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |