Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Plant use and deposition at King’s Reach, a late-seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century site, Calvert County, Maryland

Bibliographic Data

ID12064488
AuthorsKandace D Hollenbach (0000-0002-4110-3933, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, corresponding author), Barbara J Heath (0000-0003-1652-0089, University of Tennessee at Knoxville)
Year2026
Volume45
Issue2
Pages1-23
Publication date2026-02-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSoutheastern Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-578X • E-ISSN: 2168-4723
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0734578x.2026.2621594
OpenAlexW7133707858
LanguageEN
References cited28

For the past four decades, archaeologists researching the early colonial period of the Chesapeake region have relied on data other than macrobotanical remains to discuss the agricultural practices, dietary staples, and use of plants for medicinal or ornamental purposes. Plant remains from several contexts at King’s Reach (18CV83), the site of two earthfast structures occupied circa 1689–1711, provide information about the agricultural strategies pursued by Richard Smith Jr., the wealthy plantation owner, as he navigated the downturn in the tobacco market in the late seventeenth century. The plant assemblage, which includes bottle gourd seeds and possible cowpea, also hints at the foodways of enslaved laborers. The macrobotanical remains thus enhance our understanding of local agricultural practices as well as add to our interpretations of social relations associated with the contexts investigated at King’s Reach.

Acid deposition · Deposition (geology · Exclosure · Hydrology (agriculture · Land use · American Environmental and Regional History · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies

  • African American Slave Medicine

    Herbert C Covey•African American Slave Medicine•2007

  • In the Shadow of Slavery

    Judith A Carney, Judith Carney et al.•In the Shadow of Slavery•2009

  • Seed Identification Manual

    Alexander C Martin, William D Barkley et al.•Seed Identification Manual•1961

  • Social Dimensions of Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Slaves' Uses of Plants at Poplar Forest

    Jessica Bowes, H B Trigg et al.•Jefferson's Poplar Forest•2012

  • Indian Slavery in Colonial Times Within the Present Limits of the United States

    Almon Wheeler Lauber•Indian Slavery in Colonial Times…•1913

  • Preserving the gourd perspective (Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl. [Cucurbitaceae])

    Open Access•Hew D V Prendergast, Deena S Decker‐Walters et al.•Economic Botany•2000

  • The Fichtelgebirge Bead and Button Industry of Bavaria

    Karlis Karklins, Sibylle Jargstorf et al.•Beads (Ottawa. Online)/Beads•2016

  • Prehistoric habitat stability and post-settlement habitat change in a Chesapeake Bay freshwater tidal wetland, USA

    Open Access•William B Hilgartner, Grace S Brush•The Holocene•2006

  • Soils and settlement location in 18th century colonial Tidewater Virginia

    Craig Lukezic•Historical Archaeology•1990

  • Differential pollen preservation in a seventeenth-century refuse pit, Jamestown Island, Virginia

    Open Access•Gerald K Kelso, Mrozowski et al.•Historical Archaeology•1995

  • Dynamic Landscapes

    Barbara J Heath•Historical Archaeology•2016

  • Comparative Paleoethnobotanical Study of the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake

    Open Access•Barbara J Heath, Kandace D Hollenbach•Historical Archaeology•2025

  • Identifying activity areas in archaeological soils from a colonial Virginia house lot using phytolith analysis and soil chemistry

    Open Access•Ken Sullivan, K A Sullivan et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2004

  • Archaeological Perspectives On and Contributions To the Study of Colonial American Gardens

    Shirley L Baugher, S Baugher et al.•Landscape Journal•2002

  • Spatial analysis of the King’s Reach plantation homelot, ca. 1690–1715

    Dennis J Pogue•Historical Archaeology•1988

  • Old ways in new places? Experimenting with plants in the early plantation setting

    Jessie L Johanson, Andrew Agha•Southeastern Archaeology•2021

  • Laboring under an Illusion

    Open Access•Anna S Agbe-Davies, Anna S Agbe‐Davies•Historical Archaeology•2017

  • The little spots allow’d them”

    Barbara J Heath, Amber Bennett•Historical Archaeology•2000

  • The Origin of Slavery in the United States—The Maryland Precedent

    Jonathan L Alpert•American Journal of Legal History•1970

  • Summing the Parts

    Lorena S Walsh•The William and Mary Quarterly•1999

  • Archaeobotanical Analysis and Interpretations of Enslaved Virginian Plant Use at Rich Neck Plantation (44WB52)

    Open Access•Mrozowski, Stephen A Mrozowski et al.•American Antiquity•2008

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae