L'argumentation dans les débats télévisés entre candidats à la présidence américaine
L'appel aux émotions comme tactique de persuasion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12106072 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne-Marie Gingras, Anne‐marie Gingras (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 187-187 |
| Publication date | 1995-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hermès (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0767-9513 • E-ISSN: 1963-1006 |
| Publisher | CAIRN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4267/2042/15191 |
| OpenAlex | W2080613878 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 2 |
Using the theory of informal logic and fallacies, this article analyses the argumentation of Bill Clinton, George Bush and Ross Perot during the three televised debates between candidates running for election in the 1992 American presidential campaign. The author examines the particular role of emotional appeals, in addition to the roles of ad populum and ad hominem arguments and other fallacies. This study sheds some light on political language and discursive strategies
Argumentation theory · Art · Art history · Epistemology · George (robot · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Presidential campaign · Presidential system · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1995 - 2016 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |