Towards epistemic and linguistic justice in universities
Exploring the Australian university linguascene from student perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12113993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anikó Hato (0000-0003-1143-0041, School of Humanities and Languages UNSW, Sydney Kensington Australia, corresponding author), Eliot Allport (School of Humanities and Languages UNSW, Sydney Kensington Australia) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 222-241 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0802-6106 • E-ISSN: 1473-4192 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ijal.12611 |
| OpenAlex | W4401651226 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 43 |
This paper addresses linguistic and epistemic justice by exploring multilingual practices in tertiary contexts in an English‐dominant linguistic ecology. The paper argues that the university linguistic space (linguascene) governs language choices toward English monolingualism, and this has implications for epistemic justice in multilingual universities. While the top‐down policy of institutional monolingualism serves as the backdrop to the research, the paper is focused on individual voices and student perspectives. The study collected semi‐structured interviews from 14 tertiary students studying in Australia to interrogate their dispositions of the affordances that university spaces provide for multilingual practices. The findings of this study expose monolingual ideologies where English is seen as the legitimate norm and students do not engage with other languages through translanguaging practices. The study also reveals that students’ language norms are driven by ideologies of linguistic entrepreneurship directed at the priority of English. Students expressed doubts about the practicality of embracing multilingualism, therefore, perpetuating existing monolingual practices. The paper points to ideological barriers in the development of multilingual practices and calls for developing critical language awareness in students and academics to ensure that they become more aware of the benefits and the epistemic justice aspects of multilingual practices during their academic studies
Affordance · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Ideology · Linguistic landscape · Linguistics · Multilingualism · Norm (philosophy · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Translanguaging · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Multilingual Education and Policy · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching
Challenging the Monolingual Mindset
The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology
Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice
Signs of Difference
The Sociolinguistics of Globalization
Not a First Language but One Repertoire
Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education
Modernity at large
Towards Epistemic Justice
Epistemic (in)justice in English medium instruction
‘Inert benevolence’ towards languages beyond English in the discourses of English primary school teachers
Towards critical translanguaging pedagogy – new ways of raising and answering questions from a Global South perspective
The monolingual mindset as an impediment to the development of plurilingual potential in Australia
Situating the challenges in current languages education policy in Australia – unlearning monolingualism
Plurilingual pedagogies at the post-secondary level
Conceptualising multilingual higher education in policies, pedagogical designs and classroom practices
Ignored Lingualism
Transformative pedagogy for inclusion and social justice through translanguaging, co-learning, and transpositioning
Why linguistic entrepreneurship
Language and the limits of justice
Speaking English naturally’
Translanguaging and “English Only” at Universities
Registers of Communication
Decolonising sociolinguistics research
Multilingualism
The Commodification of Language
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |