Perspectives on Mercosur borders and border spaces
Implications for border theories
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12144302 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruno Dupeyron (0000-0003-2075-1365, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 58-67 |
| Publication date | 2009-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Borderlands Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0886-5655 • E-ISSN: 2159-1229 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08865655.2009.9695739 |
| OpenAlex | W2083541439 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 23 |
This dossier invites the Journal of Borderlands Studies (JBS) readership to explore Southern Common Market (Mercosur in Spanish and Mercosul in Portuguese-Brazilian) borders and border spaces. During the second half of the 1980s, Brazil and Argentina start negotiations related to regional integration. These talks shortly result in the foundation of the Mercosur. Thus, in 1991, Argentina and Brazil, along with Paraguay and Uruguay, sign the Mercosur founding treaty, the Treaty of Asuncion, with the ultimate objective of creating a common market. In order to achieve this goal, the Mercosur member states consider that a free trade area and a customs union need to be established, as well as the four freedoms of a common market, i.e. free movement of goods, services, persons and capital (Article 1). Subsequent treaties amend and consolidate this initial agreement. Nevertheless, the original proposed schedule (1991-1994) cannot be completed, confining the Mercosur to a free trade area with an imperfect customs union. However, these international treaties do not limit the Mercosur to a free trade bloc: the institutions of the Mercosur also reveal an intergovernmental organization that coordinates joint macroeconomic and sectoral public policies, implying a community integration purpose (Vervaele 2005, 390-391). Due to this dual facet, the enlargement and deepening of the Mercosur is progressing in several ways. First, neighbouring countries are linked to the Mercosur, as future permanent members (Bolivia and Venezuela), as associate members (Chile, Peru, Colombia and Ecuador), or as observer (Mexico). Second, agreements are signed with third parties, e.g. a free trade agreement with Israel in 2007. Third, institutions are reinforced, for instance through the creation of a permanent dispute resolution mechanism in 2002; besides, members of the Parliament of the Mercosur will be directly elected for the first time in 2010. Finally, in order to counterbalance the asymmetries of the bloc, the Mercosur members create in 2005 a structural fund, known as the Fondo para la Convergencia Estructural del Mercosur (FOCEM)
Customs union · Economic integration · Economics · European union · Free trade · International free trade agreement · International trade · Negotiation · Political science · Regional Integration · Single market · Trade agreement · Treaty · Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
The Geography of border landscapes
Frontières en Amérique latine
Border People
How ‘new’ is the ‘New Regionalism’ in the Americas? The case of Mercosur
Israeli‐Palestinian border enterprises revisited
Not our borders’
New borders for new world orders
The lines that continue to separate us
Open to surprise
The European Union as a Gated Community
Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse
Then and Now
Mercosur and Regional Integration in South America
Cultures are more hybrid than identifications
Paraguay
Mexico’s New Politics
Boundaries as social processes
The Political Economy of Mercosur
El éxito del Mercosur posible
Fronteiras
Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2017 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |