Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perspectives on Mercosur borders and border spaces

Implications for border theories

Bibliographic Data

ID12144302
AuthorsBruno Dupeyron (0000-0003-2075-1365, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume24
Issue3
Pages58-67
Publication date2009-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Borderlands Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0886-5655 • E-ISSN: 2159-1229
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08865655.2009.9695739
OpenAlexW2083541439
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited23

This dossier invites the Journal of Borderlands Studies (JBS) readership to explore Southern Common Market (Mercosur in Spanish and Mercosul in Portuguese-Brazilian) borders and border spaces. During the second half of the 1980s, Brazil and Argentina start negotiations related to regional integration. These talks shortly result in the foundation of the Mercosur. Thus, in 1991, Argentina and Brazil, along with Paraguay and Uruguay, sign the Mercosur founding treaty, the Treaty of Asuncion, with the ultimate objective of creating a common market. In order to achieve this goal, the Mercosur member states consider that a free trade area and a customs union need to be established, as well as the four freedoms of a common market, i.e. free movement of goods, services, persons and capital (Article 1). Subsequent treaties amend and consolidate this initial agreement. Nevertheless, the original proposed schedule (1991-1994) cannot be completed, confining the Mercosur to a free trade area with an imperfect customs union. However, these international treaties do not limit the Mercosur to a free trade bloc: the institutions of the Mercosur also reveal an intergovernmental organization that coordinates joint macroeconomic and sectoral public policies, implying a community integration purpose (Vervaele 2005, 390-391). Due to this dual facet, the enlargement and deepening of the Mercosur is progressing in several ways. First, neighbouring countries are linked to the Mercosur, as future permanent members (Bolivia and Venezuela), as associate members (Chile, Peru, Colombia and Ecuador), or as observer (Mexico). Second, agreements are signed with third parties, e.g. a free trade agreement with Israel in 2007. Third, institutions are reinforced, for instance through the creation of a permanent dispute resolution mechanism in 2002; besides, members of the Parliament of the Mercosur will be directly elected for the first time in 2010. Finally, in order to counterbalance the asymmetries of the bloc, the Mercosur members create in 2005 a structural fund, known as the Fondo para la Convergencia Estructural del Mercosur (FOCEM)

Customs union · Economic integration · Economics · European union · Free trade · International free trade agreement · International trade · Negotiation · Political science · Regional Integration · Single market · Trade agreement · Treaty · Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Migration, Racism, and Human Rights

  • Placing Borders in Development

    Paolo Novak•Geopolitics•2016

  • Hemispheric reconfigurations in Northern Amazonia

    Matthew Louis Bishop, Peter Clegg et al.•Third World Quarterly•2017

  • The Geography of border landscapes

    Dennis Rumley, Julian V Minghi•The Geography of border landscapes•1991

  • Frontières en Amérique latine

    Tatiana Cristina Miranda De Oliveira, Tito Carlos Machado de Oliveira•Espaces et sociétés•2009

  • Border People

    Oscar J Martinez•Border People•1994

  • How ‘new’ is the ‘New Regionalism’ in the Americas? The case of Mercosur

    Open Access•Laura Gómez-Mera, Laura Gómez‐mera•Journal of International…•2008

  • Israeli‐Palestinian border enterprises revisited

    Tamar Arieli•Journal of Borderlands Studies•2009

  • Not our borders’

    Sara Singleton•Journal of Borderlands Studies•2008

  • New borders for new world orders

    Open Access•Vladimir Kolossov, John Ο’loughlin et al.•GeoJournal•1998

  • The lines that continue to separate us

    Open Access•David Newman•Progress in Human Geography•2006

  • Open to surprise

    Open Access•John Agnew•Progress in Human Geography•2006

  • The European Union as a Gated Community

    Open Access•H Van Houtum, Roos Pijpers et al.•Antipode•2007

  • Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse

    Anssi Paasi•Regional Studies•1999

  • Then and Now

    Open Access•Jean Blondel•Political Studies•1999

  • Mercosur and Regional Integration in South America

    Open Access•John AE Vervaele, J A E Vervaele•International and Comparative Law…•2005

  • Cultures are more hybrid than identifications

    Open Access•A Grimson•Latino Studies•2006

  • Paraguay

    Open Access•Arturo Valenzuela•Journal of democracy•1997

  • Mexico’s New Politics

    Open Access•John Bailey, Arturo Valenzuela•Journal of democracy•1997

  • Boundaries as social processes

    Anssi Paasi•Geopolitics•1998

  • The Political Economy of Mercosur

    Open Access•Luigi Manzetti•Journal of Interamerican Studies…•1994

  • El éxito del Mercosur posible

    Open Access•Aldo Ferrer•Brazilian Journal of Political…•2007

  • Fronteiras

    Open Access•José Luiz Bica De Mélo, José Luiz Bica Mélo•Sociologias•2004

  • Regional Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean

    Open Access•Victor Bulmer-Thomas, Victor Bulmer‐thoma et al.•Bulletin of Latin American Research•2001

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2016 - 2017 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae