One Too Many
Hermeneutical Excess as Hermeneutical Injustice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12147803 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicole Dular (0000-0001-5866-2582, Notre Dame of Maryland University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 423-438 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hypatia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-5367 • E-ISSN: 1527-2001 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/hyp.2023.20 |
| OpenAlex | W4385185526 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 19 |
Hermeneutical injustice, as a species of epistemic injustice, is when members of marginalized groups are unable to make their experiences communicatively intelligible due to a deficiency in collective hermeneutical resources, where this deficiency is traditionally interpreted as a lack of concepts. Against this understanding, this article argues that even if adequate concepts that describe marginalized groups’ experiences are available within the collective hermeneutical resources, hermeneutical injustice can persist. This article offers an analysis of how this can happen by introducing the notion of hermeneutical excess: the introduction of additional concepts into collective hermeneutical resources that function to obscure agents’ understanding of the lived experiences of marginalized groups. The injustice of hermeneutical excesses happens not due to hermeneutical marginalization (the exclusion of members of marginalized groups from the construction of hermeneutical resources), but rather from hermeneutical domination: when members of dominant groups have been inappropriately included in the construction of hermeneutical resources. By taking as exemplary cases the concepts of “reverse racism” and “nonconsensual sex,” this article shows how such excesses are introduced as a kind of defensive strategy used by dominant ideologies precisely when progress with social justice is made
Collective responsibility · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Hermeneutics · Ideology · Injustice · Political science · Politics · Social injustice · Sociology · Theology · Critical Race Theory in Education · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Calling trauma, elite capture, and hermeneutical injustice
Self-inflicted epistemic injustice
Commemoration and Constriction
Affect, attention, and injustice
The Harms of Self-Help Discourse
Understanding Doxastic Injustice
Ameliorating Linguistic Anchors of Oppression
The metaphysics of conceptual engineering
Intergenerational Formative Epistemic Injustice
Rejecting Identities
Consent theory as hermeneutical injustice
Krinostic Injustice
Just The Facts
Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices
Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism
The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance
Dark Ghettos
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions
Justice and the Politics of Difference
Racial gaslighting
Hermeneutical Dissent and the Species of Hermeneutical Injustice
Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice
Two Kinds of Unknowing
Hermeneutical Injustice
Gaslighting and Echoing, or Why Collective Epistemic Resistance is not a “Witch Hunt”
Cultural Gaslighting
White Feminist Gaslighting
Me Too
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |