Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

All‐or‐None” Versus “Most‐or‐Some” Options in Risky Choice

Effects of Domain and Handedness

Bibliographic Data

ID12166310
AuthorsStephen D Christman (0000-0003-1773-6332, University of Toledo Toledo OH 43606 USA, corresponding author), John D Jasper (University of Toledo Toledo OH 43606 USA)
Year2014
Volume27
Issue4
Pages378-385
Publication date2014-01-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.1815
OpenAlexW1937297936
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

Two methodological variants of Kahneman and Tversky's Asian disease scenario were investigated. One variant involved replacing the “all‐or‐none” outcome scenarios of the risky choice with “most‐or‐some” scenario outcomes, and the second variant involved replacing the negative domain of lives lost with a positive domain of jobs created. In addition, the effects of strength of handedness, a variable related to individual differences in risk perception, were examined. Results indicated that standard framing effects were obtained across both domains, with a decrease in risky choice under the gain domain. Scenario type also interacted with handedness, such that the all‐or‐none scenario yielded framing effects for consistent (strong)‐handers only, whereas the most‐or‐some scenario yielded framing effects for inconsistent (mixed)‐handers only (consistent‐handers are those who use the same hand exclusively for almost all activities). These results demonstrate that framing effects are strongly influenced by the presence versus absence of extreme/absolute outcomes and that individuals (in this case, decision makers with varying degrees of handedness strength) are differentially sensitive to different pieces of information. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Cognitive psychology · Economics · Framing (construction · Framing effect · Microeconomics · Perception · Prospect theory · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Stand your ground!” Defending oneself against cue-induced food craving in the context of the Sword-and-Shield-Hypothesis of embodiment

    Open Access•Marny Münnich, Marny Katharina Münnich et al.•Appetite•2026

  • The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions

    Open Access•Anton Kühberger•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1998

  • False-Positive Psychology

    Open Access•Joseph P Simmons, L D Nelson et al.•Psychological Science•2011

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • The assessment and analysis of handedness

    Open Access•R C Oldfield•Neuropsychologia•1971

  • Choices, values, and frames

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•American Psychologist•1984

  • Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience

    Richard J Davidson•American Psychologist•2000

  • Gender differences in risk taking

    James P Byrnes, David C Miller et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1999

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae