Testing the incremental validity of the Vroom-Jago versus Vroom-Yetton models of participation in decision making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12166352 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Field (0000-0003-2613-2688, University of Alberta, corresponding author), Richard H G Field, Jac Andrews (University of Alberta), J P Andrews |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 251-261 |
| Publication date | 1998-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(1998120)11:4<251::aid-bdm300>3.0.co;2-2 |
| OpenAlex | W2156063692 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
In three samples of manager-reported decisions the Vroom–Jago model's predictions were supported. Decisions that more closely fit the recommended decision method were rated as higher in effectiveness. The model was also found to account for more variance in decision effectiveness than the prior Vroom–Yetton model. It was also found that the Vroom–Jago model's greater precision in situational assessment and derived prescriptions allow for greater discrimination in choice of decision method across all situations. Copyright© 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Economics · Situational ethics · Variance (accounting · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |