Eye Movements in Strategic Choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12166360 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Neil Stewart (0000-0002-2202-018X, University of Warwick Coventry UK, corresponding author), Simon Gächter (0000-0002-7182-8505, University of Nottingham Nottingham UK), Takao Noguchi (0000-0002-4480-2078, University College London London UK), Timothy L Mullett (0000-0002-4082-2813, University of Warwick Coventry UK) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 137-156 |
| Publication date | 2015-10-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bdm.1901 |
| PMID | 27513881 |
| OpenAlex | W1859052877 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 37 |
In risky and other multiattribute choices, the process of choosing is well described by random walk or drift diffusion models in which evidence is accumulated over time to threshold. In strategic choices, level- k and cognitive hierarchy models have been offered as accounts of the choice process, in which people simulate the choice processes of their opponents or partners. We recorded the eye movements in 2 × 2 symmetric games including dominance-solvable games like prisoner's dilemma and asymmetric coordination games like stag hunt and hawk-dove. The evidence was most consistent with the accumulation of payoff differences over time: we found longer duration choices with more fixations when payoffs differences were more finely balanced, an emerging bias to gaze more at the payoffs for the action ultimately chosen, and that a simple count of transitions between payoffs-whether or not the comparison is strategically informative-was strongly associated with the final choice. The accumulator models do account for these strategic choice process measures, but the level- k and cognitive hierarchy models do not. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Cognition · Cognitive dissonance · Cognitive psychology · Dilemma · Economics · Fictitious play · Game theory · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Normal-form game · Prisoner's dilemma · Risk dominance · Sequential game · Stochastic game · Strategic Choice · Traveler's dilemma · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Mathematics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology
Learning in Interactive Decision-Making
Ambivalence in decision making
The influence of visual attention on memory-based preferential choice
The role of attention and frames on third-party punishment and compensation choices
The power of last fixation
Now or Later? Attentional Processing and Intertemporal Choice
Order in multi‐attribute product choice decisions
Applications and Innovations of Eye‐movement Research in Judgment and Decision Making
Eye Movements in Strategic Choice
Understanding cognitive and affective mechanisms in social psychology through eye-tracking
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives
Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour
Psychology of Reading
Decision field theory
On Players′ Models of Other Players
A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games
Multialternative decision field theory
Decision by sampling
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions
The physics of optimal decision making
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Eye Movements in Risky Choice
Eye Movements in Strategic Choice
Eye‐tracking Social Preferences
An Experimental Measurement of Utility
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |