Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hormonal changes after competition predict sex‐differentiated decision‐making

Bibliographic Data

ID12166605
AuthorsAdrián Alacreu‐Crespo (0000-0002-0633-2810, Department of Psychobiology University of Valencia Valencia Spain), Raquel Costa (0000-0003-1614-540X, Department of Psychobiology University of Valencia Valencia Spain, corresponding author), Diana Abad‐Tortosa (0000-0002-3589-1355, Department of Psychobiology University of Valencia Valencia Spain), Vanesa Hidalgo (0000-0003-3920-1099, Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience, IDOCAL University of Valencia Valencia Spain), Alicia Salvador (0000-0002-8686-8083, Department of Psychobiology University of Valencia Valencia Spain), Miguel Angel Serrano (0000-0002-6574-4532, Department of Psychobiology University of Valencia Valencia Spain)
Year2019
Volume32
Issue5
Pages550-563
Publication date2019-05-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.2128
OpenAlexW2942807789
LanguageEN
References cited67

Recent neuroendocrinology research has pointed out that testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) changes after social interactions can predict risk‐taking behavior in decision‐making, depending on the sex of participants. However, previous research has focused on the effects of the changes in only one hormone, rather than the interaction between them, even though C can suppress T activity. Our aim was to test, in men and women, the role of T changes moderated by C changes after competition in decision‐making. Thus, 48 males and 46 females completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) after a laboratory competition or a noncompetitive task (control task). Saliva samples were collected before and after the competition/control task. IGT was employed to measure risk‐taking decision‐making, considering the degree of uncertainty. Our results showed sex‐differentiated effects of T and C changes on risk‐taking behavior. On the one hand, men from both task groups (Competition/Control) who had higher C and T changes after competition showed more risk‐taking decision‐making (higher IG Risk). On the other hand, women from the competitive task who had high C and T showed conservative decision‐making. Therefore, these results show sex‐differentiated decision‐making profiles, which would help to understand how men and women behave after experiencing a competitive social context

Biology · Cognition · Competition (biology · Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Economics · Iowa gambling task · Psychiatry · Task (project management · Testosterone (patch · Demography · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Medicine · Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology · Stress Responses and Cortisol · Ecology · Internal Medicine

  • Testosterone and financial risk preferences

    Open Access•Coren L Apicella, C Apicella et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2008

  • Decision making under stress

    Open Access•Katrin Starcke, Matthias Brand•Neuroscience & Biobehavioral…•2012

  • Tend and Befriend

    Open Access•Shelley E Taylor•Current Directions in Psychological…•2006

  • Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor

    Open Access•J Coates, J M Coates et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart

    Open Access•Peter M Todd, Gerd Gigerenzer•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex

    Open Access•Antoine Bechara, Antonio R Damasio et al.•Cognition•1994

  • Biobehavioral responses to stress in females

    Shelley E Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein et al.•Psychological Review•2000

  • Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone

    Open Access•Paola Sapienza, Luigi Zingales et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition

    Maryanne Fisher, Maryanne L Fisher•Oxford Handbook of Women and…•2014

  • A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking

    Open Access•Laurence Steinberg•Developmental Review•2008

  • A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale

    Open Access•Elke U Weber, Ann-Renée Blais et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2002

  • The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making

    Open Access•Martin Reimann, Antoine Bechara•Journal of Economic Psychology•2010

  • Decision making and testosterone

    Open Access•Dana R Carney, Malia F Mason•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010

  • Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious

    Seymour Epstein•American Psychologist•1994

  • Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses

    Sally S Dickerson, Margaret E Kemeny•Psychological Bulletin•2004

  • Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty

    Katrin Starcke, Matthias Brand•Psychological Bulletin•2016

  • Gender differences in risk taking

    James P Byrnes, David C Miller et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae