Protecting Freedom to Manifest One's Religion or Belief
Strasbourg or Luxembourg
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12188646 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erica Howard (0000-0003-0848-5033, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 159-182 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0924-0519 • E-ISSN: 2214-7357 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/016934411403200204 |
| OpenAlex | W645292408 |
| Language | EN |
Persons who want to manifest their religion through the wearing of religious symbols but who are prohibited from doing so appear to be unlikely to be successful in challenging these prohibitions under Articles 9 or 14 ECHR before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, although very recent case law might tentatively suggest a shift in this approach. This article gives an overview of this case law, including the recent judgment in Eweida and others v. the United Kingdom, and this is followed by an analysis of a number of arguments which suggest that a challenge to bans on the wearing of religious symbols would have more chance of being successful in the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg
Economic Justice · Economics · European court of justice · European union · European Union law · Freedom of Religion · Human rights · Political science · Religious freedom · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Religious Freedom and Discrimination
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |