The Quiet Expansion of Universal Jurisdiction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12198056 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melanie Langer (0000-0003-4462-3341, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author), Máximo Langer (School of Law, University of California Los Angeles, USA), Mackenzie Eason (University of California, Los Angeles) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 779-817 |
| Publication date | 2019-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0938-5428 • E-ISSN: 1464-3596 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ejil/chz050 |
| OpenAlex | W2994846074 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
Based on an original worldwide survey of all universal jurisdiction complaints over core international crimes presented between 1961 and 2017 and against widespread perception by international criminal law experts that universal jurisdiction is in decline, this article shows that universal jurisdiction practice has been quietly expanding as there has been a significant growth in the number of universal jurisdiction trials, in the frequency with which these trials take place year by year and in the geographical scope of universal jurisdiction litigation. This expansion is likely the result of, among other factors, the adoption of International Criminal Court implementing statutes, the creation of specialized international crimes units by states, institutional learning by states and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), technological changes, new migration and refugee waves to universal jurisdiction states, criticisms of international criminal law as neo-colonial and the search of new venues by human rights NGOs. The expansion of universal jurisdiction has been quiet because most tried defendants have been low-level, universal jurisdiction states have not made an effort to publicize these trials and observers have wrongly assumed that Belgium and Spain were representative of universal jurisdiction trends. The article finally assesses positive and negative aspects of the quiet expansion of universal jurisdiction for its defenders and critics
Criminal jurisdiction · Human rights · International law · Jurisdiction · Original jurisdiction · Personal jurisdiction · Political science · Statute · Subject-matter jurisdiction · Universal jurisdiction · Corporate Law and Human Rights · International Law and Human Rights · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Law
A polycentric system of international criminal justice
Crumbling Safe Havens? International Justice Regime and Conflict Amnesty for Serious Crimes
State Nobility in the Field of International Criminal Justice
Cultural competence amidst evidentiary transformations
Universal Jurisdiction and Civil Society
The expressive turn of international criminal justice
Justice Sites and the Fight against Atrocity Crimes
Should German Courts Prosecute Syrian International Crimes? Revisiting the “Dual Foundation” Thesis
Introducing the Transitional Justice Evaluation Tools (TJET) database
How to Win a Genocide Case
Capital and Brokerage in International Criminal Justice
Hate Crimes Against Minorities in India
Belligerent Capital and Bare Agents
The standardisation of transitional justice
Prosecutorial-NGO Complex
Migration and the Demand for Transnational Justice
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |