GM Crops in Hungary
Comparing Mass Media Framing and Public Understanding of Technoscientific Controversy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12205283 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lilla Vicsek (0000-0002-6034-7503, Corvinus University of Budapest, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 344-368 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science as Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0950-5431 • E-ISSN: 1470-1189 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09505431.2014.884062 |
| OpenAlex | W2051988238 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 45 |
Unlike some Western societies, in Hungary there has not been intensive public debate on the issue of genetically modified crops. The mass media has published little to inform Hungarian lay people about GM crops or their relevance to the country. Nevertheless the media did convey some general impressions, mainly from within an Anti-GM Threat frame. Several elements from the mass media were present in lay focus group discussions – e.g. GM crops branded a food risk, general focus on risks, health risk identified as important risk, foreign companies regarded as source of the problem and as being ‘just out for profit’, image of corn, rhetoric of deterioration, etc. This overlap is in consonance with theories postulating such similarities, whereby the media framing provides a resource which can be appropriated for public understanding. At the same time, there were also differences: some elements of the dominant media frame were mentioned only vaguely or in a somewhat modified way. Other issues raised in the media frame, not resonating with wider cultural themes, were absent from focus group discussions (e.g. environmental concerns). And participants were also able to rely on other conversational resources (analogous reasoning, cultural themes) to formulate some additional issues beyond the media reportage. \n \nKEY WORDS: GM CROPS, PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS, MEDIA FRAMING \n
Constructive · Environmental ethics · Focus group · Framing (construction · Mass media · Media studies · Newspaper · Political science · Public relations · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · Theology · Anthropology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · History · Law
Critical Communication Studies
Collective symbolic coping with new technology
Making news
Is Anyone Responsible?
Whole World Is Watching
Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology
“It just goes against the grain.” Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK
Biotechnology in Switzerland
“Words of mass destruction”
Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy
Preferences Need no Inferences, Once Again
Understanding public support for stem cell research
Mass media framing of biotechnology news
Controlling Biotechnology
Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
Misunderstanding Science
Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy
The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science—Discourse and Comparative Evidence
Framing as a Theory of Media Effects
Media presentation and public understanding of stem cells and stem cell research in Hungary
Gene-fouled or gene-improved?” Media framing of GM crops and food in Hungary
Public engagement in Japanese policy-making
Issues in the Analysis of Focus Groups
Distinguishing Red and Green Biotechnology
Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy
Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Segregating GM Crops
Pollution Metaphors In The Uk Biotechnology Controversy
The genius of a nation versus the gene‐tech of a nation
Between Risk and Opportunity
The Whole World Is Watching
Localized Debates of Agricultural Biotechnology in Community Newspapers
Structuring Public Debate on Biotechnology
Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology
Beliefs About Science and News Frames in Audience Evaluations of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cell Research
Costs and Benefits of Stem Cell Research and Treatment
Framing
Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology
A Scheme for Analyzing the Results of Focus Groups
Ethical Issues in Qualitative E-Learning Research
The human drama of genetics
Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |