Explaining the Hwang Scandal
National Scientific Culture and its Global Relevance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12205487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leo Kim (a London School of Economics , UK), Leo A Kim (0000-0001-9106-6416, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 397-415 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science as Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0950-5431 • E-ISSN: 1470-1189 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09505430802515023 |
| OpenAlex | W2030568490 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 11 |
The cloning scandal around South Korean scientist Hwang Woo Suk—who had forged scientific data and taken donor eggs from his PhD student—has often been explained by stereotyped models of cultural difference. As two national features which partly account for the scandal, knowledge acquisition in South Korea has close connections to hierarchies of status and prestige; and the life sciences there have a technological approach focused on applications. Similarly, the South Korean work ethos imposes a severe workload on junior researchers. Combined with expectations of self-sacrifice, this scientific culture mobilizes people as resources for scientific experiments and deters any criticism. Although such national features influence research practices in South Korea, they have global relevance. Actors do not merely conform to hegemonic authority structures; rather, they use various tactics to incorporate, appropriate, and twist the cultural ‘rules of the game’. The Hwang scandal resulted from such interactions between actors, strategies, knowledges and narratives. Thus the scandal has general features that increasingly arise beyond South Korea, especially as science worldwide faces greater competitive pressures. National cultural differences should be seen as a resource for understanding how similar problems arise, albeit in apparently different ways
Criticism · Environmental ethics · Ethos · Hegemony · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Prestige · Public relations · Relevance (law · Sociology · Superpower · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Law · Science, Research, and Medicine
Genetics and Society
Stem Cell Research and Cloning
Denotation and connotation in public representation
Governing Discourses of Stem Cell Research
Stem Cell Science and Its Public
Stem Cell Science and its Public
The Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in South Korea
Between Fraud and Hope
Bioethical Governance in South Korea
The Politics of Technoscience in Korea
Attention to Stem Cell Research in Japanese Mass Media
The Case of Inferred Doability
Diagnosing “Collaborative Culture” Of Biomedical Science in South Korea
Exploring appropriation of “surplus” ova and embryos in Indian IVF clinics
Science policy and the geographic preferences of stem cell scientists
Your problem is that your face reveals everything when you are lying”
Situated bio-regulation
Crimes against Community
Constituting Public Support for the National Stem Cell Project
State-Supported Science and Imaginary Lock-in
Promising Potency
Stem Cell Technologies 1998–2008
Enculturating Cells
Questions of Cultural Identity
Science, patriotism and discourses of nation and culture
Questioning Hype, Rescuing Hope? The Hwang Stem Cell Scandal and the Reassertion of Hopeful Horizons
Imagined communities
Democratising Science? The Politics of Promoting Biomedicine in Singapore's Developmental State
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,28 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2022 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |