The Case of Inferred Doability
An Analysis of the Socio-institutional Background of the STAP Cell Scandal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15674282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Koichi Mikami (0000-0002-6274-4713, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 123-142 |
| Publication date | 2018-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-2152 • E-ISSN: 1875-2160 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1215/18752160-4202323 |
| OpenAlex | W2793033438 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 54 |
On 28 January 2014, Haruko Obokata and her colleagues held a press conference regarding their new method of producing stem cells. The cells, named STAP (stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency) cells, were of considerable interest not only for stem cell scientists but also for the wider society in Japan because both its government and citizens enjoyed the international reputation earned for the country by Shinya Yamanaka’s earlier success in developing a novel technique of cell reprogramming. However, it was soon pointed out that the data in the research article seemed fabricated and was hence suggested that their claims lacked scientific credibility. What was initially considered another triumph of Japanese stem cell research thus resulted in a major national scandal. Instead of seeing this case merely as one of scientific misconduct, this article examines it as a window into the local culture of stem cell research and argues that the socio-institutional background of Obokata’s work incited the researchers involved to infer doability of STAP cell research. The problem with this inference surfaced after those who did not share the culture challenged the robustness of her work, suggesting some cultures of science may be more vulnerable to scientific misconduct than others
Institutional analysis · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Changes in Scholars’ Ways of Knowledge Production Shaped by Systematic Measures
Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2019
The Rise of Public Engagement in Japan and the UK
Comparative analysis of media coverage concerning the social implications on three life sciences in Japan during 1991–2020
Life, Science, and Power in History and Philosophy
Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors
The structure of scientific revolutions
Knowledge and social imagery
Global Assemblages
Techno-Nationalism versus Techno-Globalism
Local biologicals and the politics of standardization
Body and Enhancement Technology
How Could a Scientist Become a National Celebrity
Attention to Stem Cell Research in Japanese Mass Media
Science, patriotism and discourses of nation and culture
Regulating cell lives in Japan
Framing pluripotency
State-Supported Science and Imaginary Lock-in
Debates on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Japan
Standardizing the Unknown
Explaining the Hwang Scandal
Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research
Risk and Blame
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,86 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |