Doing Harm
A Reply to Klocksiem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12228551 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erik Carlson (0000-0002-1558-3865, Uppsala University), Jesper Johansson (0000-0002-2484-4502, Uppsala University, corresponding author), Olle Risberg (0000-0001-5820-1145, Uppsala University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 229-237 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0953820823000079 |
| OpenAlex | W4378653020 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 11 |
In a recent article in this journal, Justin Klocksiem proposes a novel response to the widely discussed failure to benefit problem for the counterfactual comparative account of harm (CCA). According to Klocksiem, proponents of CCA can deal with this problem by distinguishing between facts about there being harm and facts about an agent's having done harm. In this reply, we raise three sets of problems for Klocksiem's approach
Counterfactual thinking · Criminology · Do no harm · Economics · Epistemology · Harm · Law and economics · Positive economics · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |