Workplace Conflict and the Origins of the 1984-85 Miners' Strike in Scotland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12239605 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jim Phillips (0000-0002-5183-9469, University of Glasgow, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 152-172 |
| Publication date | 2009-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Twentieth Century British History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0955-2359 • E-ISSN: 1477-4674 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/tcbh/hwn047 |
| OpenAlex | W2112235373 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Literature on the 1984–5 miners’ strike in Britain tends to be dominated by examination of peak level relations between the Conservative government, the National Coal Board and the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM). The strike is usually depicted as being illegitimately imposed, without a national ballot, on the industry and the miners by the NUM leadership. This article develops a more rounded perspective on the strike, by locating its origins in workplace conflict which had been steadily escalating in the early 1980s in the Scottish coalfields. A significant portion of Scottish miners, anxious about employment prospects and angry about managerial incursions on established joint industrial regulation of daily mining operations, pushed their union towards a more militant position. This subverts the conventional picture of the strike as a top-down phenomenon. In this respect events in Scotland, which rarely feature in established literature, were in fact extremely important, shaping the national strike that emerged from the workforce's opposition to managerial authoritarianism as well as the closure of ‘uneconomic’ pits. The peak level context of deteriorating relations and pit level details of incrementally intensifying workplace conflict are established through industry and trade union records and press accounts
Archaeology · Collective bargaining · Context (archaeology · Economics · Labor relations · Labour economics · Militant · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Trade union · Workforce · Labor Movements and Unions · Mining and Resource Management · History · Industrial Relations · Law
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2024 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |