Gender Diversity in Cooperative Boards
Favoring and Hindering Factors in a Scoping Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12249354 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sandra de Souza Schmidt (0000-0002-4183-6133, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, corresponding author), Eduardo Damião da Silva (0000-0002-8182-6394, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná), Marina Romeo (0000-0002-6961-6626, Universitat de Barcelona) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-35 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Voluntas Revista Internacional de Filosofia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2179-3786 • E-ISSN: 1573-7888 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0957876526000100 |
| OpenAlex | W7141249677 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Cooperatives are built on principles of democracy and equity, yet women continue to be underrepresented in their governance structures. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) scoping review synthesizes 25 peer-reviewed empirical studies on factors enabling or hindering women’s participation in cooperative boards. Across studies, individual enablers include qualifications, prior performance, and collaborative leadership, whereas stereotypes, heightened expectations to overperform, and internalized bias constrain access and legitimacy. Organizational enablers include inclusive recruitment, mentoring, and flexible arrangements; barriers include male-dominated cultures, restrictive bylaws, and informal networks. At the environmental level, quota legislation, training initiatives, and support networks can foster change, but weak enforcement and entrenched social norms often limit impact. Anchored in a Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) lens, the review argues that advancing gender diversity requires structural and cultural reforms beyond “fix-the-women” approaches, and offers implications for cooperative leaders and policymakers. These insights support efforts to align cooperative governance with SDGs 5, 10, and 16
Collective action · Corporate governance · Diversity (politics · Empirical research · Enforcement · Gender diversity · Inclusion (mineral · Cooperative Studies and Economics · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation
Women Directors on Corporate Boards
A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance
Rising Tide
Rediscovering the Cooperative Enterprise
Women in the boardroom
(In)Equality and commitments
Transformational leadership and performance in social economy entities
Women and Top Leadership Positions
To Regulate Or Not To Regulate? Early Evidence on the Means Used Around the World to Promote Gender Diversity in the Boardroom
The political economy of women's cooperatives in Turkey
Gender Quotas for Agricultural Boards
The Complex Relationship between the Board and Web Transparency in Nonprofit Organizations
Irish Credit Unions
Exploring the Participation of Women in Financial Cooperatives and Credit Unions in Developing Countries
Beyond social equity
Gender, Status, and Leadership
The Role of Gender in Government and Nonprofit Workplaces
The anti-DEI agenda
Female Leadership Advantage and Disadvantage
(Des)igualdade de género nos órgãos das cooperativas portuguesas
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms
Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |