Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Putting the cart before the horse

Resource allocation systems and community care

Bibliographic Data

ID12284245
AuthorsLucy Series (0000-0003-0173-8165, a Department of Law , University of Exeter , Exeter , UK, corresponding author), LUKE CLEMENTS (b Cardiff Law School , Cardiff , UK)
Year2013
Volume35
Issue2
Pages207-226
Publication date2013-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Social Welfare Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-8033 • E-ISSN: 1469-9621
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09649069.2013.800288
OpenAlexW2006951024
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited1

The English Care Bill provides for all eligible community care service users to have a personal budget – and councils were required to ensure that 70% of such users had one by April 2013. Almost all English authorities are experimenting with Resource Allocation Systems (RASs) as a way of calculating these budgets. This paper describes and critically analyses the nature of the RASs being used and the increasing body of case law they are attracting – in particular the Supreme Court's 2012 judgment in R (KM) Cambridgeshire County Council. The paper draws on research involving 20 local authorities concerning their use of RASs and represents the first in-depth legal examination of the claims made by proponents of the use of RASs. It challenges many of the claims made concerning such systems- in particular that they are ‘more transparent’, ‘more equitable’, ‘simpler’ and less discretionary than the traditional social work led community care assessment process

Business · Cart · Economics · Management · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Resource (disambiguation · Resource allocation · Service (business · Supreme court · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Marketing

  • The Future of Social Care

    Open Access•Peter Beresford, Colin Slasberg•The Future of Social Care•2023

  • The mixed and misleading messages within adult social care – implications for the social work role to assess need and plan support

    Colin Slasberg, Peter Beresford•Journal of Social Work Practice•2022

  • The eligibility question – the real source of depersonalisation

    Colin Slasberg, Peter Beresford•Disability & Society•2016

  • The false narrative about personal budgets in England

    Colin Slasberg, Peter Beresford•Disability & Society•2016

  • Promoting human rights or increasing expectations? Effects of Self-Directed Support on the realisation of human rights in Scotland

    Open Access•Daria Biziewska, George Palattiyil•Disability & Society•2022

  • Administrative justice? Realising the right to independent living in England

    Tabitha Collingbourne•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2013

  • Is Personalization the Right Plan at the Wrong Time? Re‐thinking Cash‐for‐Care in an Age of Austerity

    Open Access•Charlotte Pearson, Jasper Ridley et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2017

  • Social work, personalisation, and the

    Open Access•Harry Bark•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  • The morphogenesis of disability policies and the personalisation of social services. A case study from Italy

    Riccardo Prandini, Matteo Orlandini•International Review of Sociology•2018

  • Carework as a form of bodywork

    Open Access•Julia Twigg•Ageing and Society•2000

Citations per year0.69
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae