Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The morphogenesis of disability policies and the personalisation of social services. A case study from Italy

Bibliographic Data

ID7822371
AuthorsRiccardo Prandini (0000-0002-2581-3476, University of Bologna, Nonantola, Mo, Italy, corresponding author), Matteo Orlandini (University of Bologna, Nonantola, Mo, Italy)
Year2018
Volume28
Issue1
Pages86-109
Publication date2018-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0390-6701 • E-ISSN: 1469-9273
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03906701.2017.1422887
OpenAlexW2792012345
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited35

Across Europe, and particularly since the 2008 Financial Crisis, new demands for tailor-made services came from different actors and perspectives: user-led organizations, intellectuals, policy makers, social workers, advocacy organizations, which call for a new way of programming, realizing and evaluating social policies. Personalization became a relevant part of the so called ‘welfare innovation narrative’, which concerns – to name but a few – English personalization agenda, Scottish self-directed support, Finnish education system, Norwegian cash-for-care policies. Even the European Commission is addressing new social services, reshaped through users’ capabilities. The aim of this paper is to critically explain, through a case study focused on the Sardinian disability policy, how social policy's morphogenetic cycles influence the governance of personalized disability plans and, consequently, the possibility of their implementation

Business · Corporate governance · Economic policy · Economics · European commission · Management · Norwegian · Personalization · Political science · Public relations · Social policy · Social Welfare · Sociology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Marketing

  • Disability care services between welfare regime pre-conditioning and emancipatory change to independent living. A comparison of 10 European cases with fuzzy set ideal-type analysis

    Open Access•Christoph Tschanz•Alter•2022

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Michéle Foster, Claudia Needham et al.•Social Policy and Society•2022

  • Some Useful Sources

    Open Access•Eloise Hummell, Michéle Foster•Social Policy and Society•2022

  • Evaluation of the personal health budget pilot programme

    Open Access•Julien Forder, Karen Jones•Debates in Personalisation•2017

  • Resource allocation systems

    Open Access•Lucy Series•Debates in Personalisation•2017

  • Evaluation of the personal health budget pilot programme

    Open Access•Julien Forder, Karen Jones et al.•Debates in Personalisation•2014

  • Experimentalist Governance

    Charles F Sabel, Jonathan Zeitlin•Oxford handbook of governance•2012

  • Capacitating Services and the Bottom-Up Approach to Social Investment

    Charles F Sabel, Charles Sabel et al.•The Uses of Social Investment•2017

  • Changing Welfare States

    Open Access•J Timo Weishaupt•From the manpower revolution to…•2011

  • New Risks, New Welfare

    Peter Taylor-Gooby•New risks, new welfare•2004

  • Rescaling Social Policies

    Yuri Kazepov•Rescaling Social Policies Towards…•2017

  • The Uses of Social Investment

    C Sabel, J Zeitlin et al.•The Uses of Social Investment•2017

  • Realist Social Theory

    Open Access•Melanie S Archer, Margaret Scotford Archer•Realist Social Theory•1995

  • The New Social Question

    Pierre Rosanvallon, Barbara Harshav•New Social Question•2000

  • Les métamorphoses de la question sociale

    Robert Castel, Marine Zecca•Agora débats/jeunesses•1995

  • Building on the original strengths of direct payments to create a better future for social care

    Colin Slasberg, Peter Beresford•Disability & Society•2015

  • Rethinking how we understand individual healthcare needs for people living with long-term conditions

    Open Access•Jez Reeve, Lucy Cooper•Health & Social Care in the…•2014

  • Putting the cart before the horse

    Lucy Series, LUKE CLEMENTS•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2013

  • The 'Southern Model' of Welfare in Social Europe

    Open Access•Maurizio Ferrera•Journal of European Social Policy•1996

  • Lisbon and social Europe

    Open Access•Claire Annesley•Journal of European Social Policy•2007

  • Personalisation in disability services and healthcare

    Open Access•Teodor Mladenov, John Owens et al.•Critical Social Policy•2015

  • Towards a mixed economy of long-term care in Norway

    Open Access•Karen Christensen•Critical Social Policy•2012

  • Any one of us could be among that number’

    Open Access•Claudia Needham, Helen Dickinson•Social Policy and Administration•2018

  • Increasing User Choice or Privatizing Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization

    Iain Ferguson•The British Journal of Social Work•2007

  • Debate

    Jon Glasby, Simon Duffy et al.•Policy & Politics•2011

  • Debates in personalisation

    Claudia Needham, Vidhya Alakeson et al.•Debates in Personalisation•2014

  • Crossing the great divide

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•World Development•1996

  • Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences

    Peter Hedström, Petri Ylikoski•Annual Review of Sociology•2010

  • Personalisation and Austerity in the Crosshairs

    Open Access•Anne Power, Andrew Power•Journal of Social Policy•2014

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae