Exploring the changes in the interrelation between public transit mode share and accessibility across income groups in major Canadian cities in the post-pandemic era
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12296304 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hisham Negm (0000-0002-1464-2640, McGill University), Ahmed El-Geneidy (0000-0002-0942-4016, McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Pages | 103792-103792 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Transport Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-6923 • E-ISSN: 1873-1236 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103792 |
| OpenAlex | W4390848072 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 39 |
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the travel behaviour of urban residents in an unprecedented manner, especially public transit (PT) users. PT has experienced a decline in ridership around the world early in the pandemic and has been struggling to rebound again to the pre-pandemic levels, whereas other modes have reached their pre-pandemic levels. PT agencies have been trying to attract users back through service improvements and other policies; nevertheless, the impacts of policies that were effective prior to the pandemic are not guaranteed in the post-pandemic world due to the lasting effects of the pandemic on travel behaviour. This study compares the changes in the impacts of accessibility, the ease of reaching destinations, to jobs by PT on commute mode share pre- and post-pandemic (2016 and 2021) with an equity lens in the three largest metropolitan regions in Canada: Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. Results show that planning for accessibility is still an impactful tool to increase PT mode share in the post-pandemic era, yet the magnitude of the impact has declined by almost 50% in Toronto and Montreal and 30% in Vancouver for low-income groups. In the post-pandemic era, the impact of accessibility on PT mode share remains higher for the low-income compared to other-income groups, which is similar to the pre-pandemic times. Understanding the changing effects of accessibility, a major land use and transport planning tool, on travel behaviour is important as PT agencies are developing strategies to restore pre-pandemic levels of ridership and increase it to reach their sustainability goals
Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Demographic economics · Destinations · Economic growth · Economics · Equity (law · Geography · Metropolitan area · Pandemic · Political science · Public transport · Tourism · Transport engineering · Engineering · Medicine · Traffic and Road Safety · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Operationalizing accessibility thresholds
Between dispersion and recentring
Evolving transport mode changes
Towards a better understanding of changes in cost per riders for bus routes before and after the Covid-19 pandemic in Montréal, Canada
Towards a combined framework for public electric vehicle charger accessibility in London
Perceived accessibility
Spatial accessibility and transport inequity in Finland
Travel and the Built Environment
How to get there? A critical assessment of accessibility objectives and indicators in metropolitan transportation plans
How is Covid-19 reshaping activity-travel behavior? Evidence from a comprehensive survey in Chicago
Is accessibility an idea whose time has finally come?
Covid-19 and Public Transportation
Modeling the commute mode share of transit using continuous accessibility to jobs
How Accessibility Shapes Land Use
Riders Who Avoided Public Transit During Covid-19
Facing the future of transit ridership
Justice in transport as justice in accessibility
Resolving the accessibility dilemma
Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada
Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies
Immigrant settlement patterns, transit accessibility, and transit use
Inequalities in transit accessibility
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |