Overcoming Social and Resource‐Based Barriers to Circular Economy
The Role of Eco‐Tech Awareness and Financial Support
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12307488 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Manjeet Kharub (0000-0003-0534-8551, Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad Delhi NCR India, corresponding author), Ashish Varma (0000-0002-8288-1539, Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad Delhi NCR India), Rama Mishra (0000-0002-4470-3766, Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad Delhi NCR India), Rahul Mishra (0000-0003-2608-7856, Institute of Management Technology), Jiju Antony (0000-0002-8197-5736, Faculty of Culture and Society Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University Newcastle UK) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sd.70742 |
| OpenAlex | W7127467897 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
The purpose of this study is to examine the barriers to circular economy (CE) practices in manufacturing industries. Utilizing the resource‐based view (RBV), the study focuses on the mediating roles of eco‐technology awareness (ETA) and financial assistance for CE (FACE) in mitigating these obstacles. A quantitative approach was used with data collection from 212 mid‐ and senior‐level managers working in the manufacturing sector, and then analyzing both direct and indirect effects through partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM), including the importance–performance map analysis (IPMA) to pinpoint areas with the greatest potential to drive CE adoption. The study results establish the key importance of ETA in CE implementation. ETA helps CE adoption first by facilitating technological know‐how to overcome barriers, and then by enabling access to funding. Furthermore, the presence of social barriers was found to moderate the influence of technical constraints, highlighting the necessity for CE strategies to incorporate both technical and social perspectives. By close analysis of financial, technical, and social aspects, the paper provides valuable information for industry professionals. Ultimately, it contributes to the CE literature by advocating a multifaceted approach addressing challenges from different perspectives and enhancing ongoing organizational commitment to sustainability
Data collection · Key (lock · Organizational structure · Partial least squares regression · Quantitative analysis (chemistry · Structural equation modeling · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Industrial Ecology · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling
Assessing Common Method Bias
The resource-based view of the firm
Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory
A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy
Towards a consensus on the circular economy
Conceptualizing the circular economy
Common method biases in behavioral research
Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency
Barriers to the circular economy
Circular economy finance
Social dimension of the circular economy
Circular economy at the company level
Moving markets towards climate change for sustainable development
The Circular Economy
A power primer
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |