Participatory practice in the context of Local Agenda 21

A case study evaluation of experience in three English local authorities

Bibliographic Data

ID12307555
AuthorsAndrew Wild (0000-0002-9837-7900, University of Sheffield), Robert L Marshall (0000-0002-0933-909X, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Robert Marshall (0000-0002-6880-9987)
Year1999
Volume7
Issue3
Pages151-162
Publication date1999-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/(sici)1099-1719(199908)7:3<151::aid-sd111>3.0.co;2-0
OpenAlexW2032686893
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited4

This paper examines the different ways in which the participatory principles of Agenda 21 are being put into practice in the UK, by reference to research in three ’progressive’ localities: Kirklees, Leicester and Mendip. The investigation includes an examination of the reasons why a participatory approach is being adopted, how the local authorities are engaging the public in Local Agenda 21 (the levels, methods and scope of participation) and how effective their approaches have been. The research reveals that a variety of participatory methods and techniques are being employed at various scales. The three authorities emphasize a listening and open approach to the decision-making process, but despite their commitment to participation there had been limited success in securing widespread involvement of people, and especially disadvantaged groups, in the process. Key issues to emerge are the importance of the commitment of key elected representatives and the need for participation to be an ongoing commitment with a preparedness to begin with ’where people are at’ rather than to set aspirations too high. The implications are that change is needed in the way local authorities relate to the communities they serve, but this will place considerable demands on already stretched local authority resources, particularly where positive action is needed to ‘build capacity’. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Action (physics · Citizen journalism · Context (archaeology · Disadvantaged · Local authority · Local government · Participatory action research · Political science · Preparedness · Process (computing · Public participation · Public relations · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Issues and Policies · Law · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub