Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing Representation at Different Scales of Decision Making

Rethinking Local is Better

Bibliographic Data

ID6328175
AuthorsSusan F Rockloff, Susan Rockloff (0000-0003-1293-1884, Central Queensland University), Susan A Moore (0000-0001-5401-2187, Murdoch University)
Year2006
Volume34
Issue4
Pages649-670
Publication date2006-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00196.x
OpenAlexW2114549597
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited34

The nature and quality of representation in public participation is crucial to reaching acceptable environmental decisions that can be implemented. Ten case studies of natural resource management groups involved in agriculture in south western Australia were conducted at four spatial scales—state, regional, land conservation district (shire or county), and subcatchment. Qualitative analysis identified the desirable qualities of representatives, and then compared perceptions of current practice at the four scales against these ideals. Desirable qualities were being an active participant, competency (skills and knowledge), credibility, adopting the group identity and commitment, communicating outside the group, having established social networks, and an ability to function in multiple roles. Analysis across scales suggests that for groups at broader spatial scales of organizing, such as the state level, representation was closer to achieving the desired qualities than at other scales. This finding is contrary to much of the current rhetoric in natural resource management, and environmental management more generally, that “local is better.” The article concludes with some thoughts as to why this is the case, suggesting that the success or otherwise of representation, and the public participation in which representatives are involved, is influenced not only by the scale of decision making but also by how representatives are selected and what they are expected to achieve

Credibility · Economics · Environmental resource management · Function (biology · Geography · Identity (music · Natural (archaeology · Natural resource · Natural resource management · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Representation (politics · Resource (disambiguation · Scale (ratio · Computer Science · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Embracing Watershed Politics

    Open Access•Edella Schlager, William Blomquist•Embracing Watershed Politics•2008

  • Environmental governance

    Open Access•Jens Newig, Oliver Fritsch•Environmental Policy and Governance•2009

  • Scale and Public Participation

    Tess Pickering, John Minnery•Planning Practice and Research•2012

  • The Public’s Acceptance of and Intention to Use ICTs when Participating in Urban Planning Processes

    Open Access•Wenshu Li, Tao Feng et al.•Journal of Urban Technology•2020

  • From international principles to local practices

    Open Access•Tanya Howard•Environment Development and…•2015

  • Regional scale integrated land use planning to meet multiple objectives

    Open Access•Leo Peskett, Patrick Metzger et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2023

  • Exploring governance learning

    Open Access•Jens Newig, Elisa Kochskämper et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Healthier land, healthier farmers

    Open Access•Jacki Schirmer, Helen L Berry et al.•Health & Place•2013

  • Post‐sustainable development

    Open Access•Morse•Sustainable Development•2008

  • Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies

    Open Access•Jens Newig, Nicolas W Jager et al.•Global Environmental Change•2023

  • Raising the bar’

    Open Access•Tanya Howard•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • Public participation and local environmental planning

    Open Access•Anna Drazkiewicz, Edward Challies et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes

    Open Access•Sarah Velten, Tamara Schaal et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Death of a planning department

    Open Access•Carolyn G Loh, Neha Sami•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Analysis of citizens' motivation and participation intention in urban planning

    Open Access•Wenshu Li, Tao Feng et al.•Cities•2020

  • The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance

    Open Access•Jens Newig, Edward Challies et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2018

  • Basics of qualitative research

    Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin et al.•Basics of qualitative research•2008

  • Resolving environmental disputes

    Gail Bingham•Resolving environmental disputes•1986

  • The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

    Open Access•A Lind, E Allan Lind et al.•Social Psychology of Procedural…•1988

  • “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation

    Thomas Webler•Fairness and Competence in…•1995

  • Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships

    Roy J Lewicki, Barbara Benedict Bunker•Trust in Organizations•1996

  • Case Study Research

    Harris Chaiklin•The Journal of Nervous and Mental…•1991

  • The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  • Democracy and Its Critics

    Carlo Invernizzi Accetti•Excellence and Leadership in a…•1962

  • Practical application of sustainable development in decision-making processes in the Great Lakes Basin

    P D Hartig, John H Hartig et al.•International Journal of…•1996

  • A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face?to?Face Groups

    Open Access•Stephanie Burkhalter, John Gastil et al.•Communication Theory•2002

  • Participatory practice in the context of Local Agenda 21

    Open Access•Andrew Wild, Robert L Marshall et al.•Sustainable Development•1999

  • Public Participation as Public Debate

    John R Parkins, Ross E Mitchell•Society & Natural Resources•2005

  • Insights and Applications - Participatory Democracy, Representative Democracy, and the Nature of Diffuse and Concentrated Interests

    Christine Overdevest•Society & Natural Resources•2000

  • Beyond Public Participation

    Patrick D Smith, Maureen H McDono Patrick D Smith•Society & Natural Resources•2001

  • The Intention Was Good”

    Michael Mascarenhas, Rik Scarce•Society & Natural Resources•2004

  • Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the U.S. Department of Energy

    Open Access•S A Carnes, M Schweitzer et al.•Technology in Society•1998

  • Notes on the Concept of Commitment

    Howard S Becker•American Journal of Sociology•1960

  • Reconfiguring environmental governance

    Open Access•Harriet Bulkeley•Political Geography•2005

  • Market Justice, Political Justice

    Open Access•Robert E Lane•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Teetering at the Top of the Ladder

    Open Access•Julia M Wondolleck, Nancy J Manring et al.•Sociological Perspectives•1996

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0.89
Citation span2008 - 2023 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae