Voice, communication technology, disability, and art
An interdisciplinary scoping review and reflection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12313679 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C T Jones (0000-0001-7057-5860, Brock University, corresponding author), Randy Johner (University of Regina), Anna Lozhkina (Media, Art, and Performance, University of Regina, Regina, Canada), Rachel Walliser (Media, Art, and Performance, University of Regina, Regina, Canada) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1297-1316 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-10 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Disability & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0968-7599 • E-ISSN: 1360-0508 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09687599.2022.2114883 |
| OpenAlex | W4296266726 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 45 |
This article describes findings of a transdisciplinary scoping literature review process that acknowledges assistive technology-users’ contributions to disability arts by clarifying the key concepts of ‘voice’, ‘communication technology’, ‘disability’, and ‘art’. Driven by the early stages of a participatory research project involving young disabled artists, the literature search was carried out between April 2019 and August 2019. The studies selected for this review (n = 14) were analyzed through a thematic narrative approach, which revealed seven overlapping themes that reflect the inseparability and transdisciplinarity of the key concepts. Later consultation with young disabled artists based on this literature review prompted changes in our research process. We conclude that nuanced research related to voice, communication technology, disability, and art is better situated in the radical expression of artists themselves, rather than in formalized research labs and codified studies such as that which housed this inquiry
Assistive technology · Disability studies · Human–computer interaction · Reflection (computer programming · Sociology · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Computer Science · Disability Rights and Representation · Gender Studies · Psychology · Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice
Giving Voice
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
Whose "Voice" is it Anyway?
Enhancing the scoping study methodology
A scoping review of scoping reviews
Crip Technoscience Manifesto
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Social Work with Disabled People
Accessibility as Aesthetic in Broadcast Media
A Sonic Journey with Alex Bulmer
Sound Technologies as Agency-Granting Prosthesis to Vocal Body
The Meanings in Making
Beyond “Cripping Up”
Comment from the Field
Disability and Postdramatic Theater
Something is happening
Cripping Communication
The mystery of madness through art and Mad Studies
What a Difference a Decade Makes
Project Re•Vision
Cripping Feminist Technoscience
Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy
Dinner Table Experience in the Flyover Provinces
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies
Scoping studies
Learning Difficulties', the Social Model of Disability and Impairment
A Disabled Actor Prepares
After Crip, Crip Afters
Loud silence
Recounting Huronia Faithfully
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |