L'époque entre nominalisme et réalisme
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12327201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andre Tosel (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 157-167 |
| Publication date | 2002-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Actuel Marx (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0994-4524 • E-ISSN: 1969-6728 |
| Publisher | CAIRN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3917/amx.032.0157 |
| OpenAlex | W2053012720 |
| Language | FR |
The nominalist critique of the concept of epoch has the effect of relegating and discarding the various philosophies of history. Such a critique, necessary as it is, is nonetheless doomed to fail, if it does not promote the critical apprehension of reality in terms of a renewed epochal thinking, capable of addressing capitalism in its current phase, that of an actualised world-system. The idea of a general history is one which does not consent to its post-modern effacement or dissolution. It is, on the contrary, an idea which can re-emerge in a renewed, trans-modern version
Apprehension · Capitalism · Epistemology · Nominalism · Political science · Politics · French Urban and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political and Social Issues
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |