Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examination of images in Australian standardised writing assessments

A case for recognising social and cultural disadvantage

Bibliographic Data

ID12346352
AuthorsKatherine Bates (0000-0002-6524-4036, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Education, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume28
Issue2
Pages257-285
Publication date2017-03-09
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Semiotics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1035-0330 • E-ISSN: 1470-1219
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10350330.2017.1292629
OpenAlexW2593442500
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited30

From a socio-cultural perspective, individuals interpret meaning from images depending on multiple factors including life experience, values, attitudes, interests and background. As such, engagement with, preference for and interpretation of images differs amongst viewers. From this premise, it seems unlikely that one visual writing assessment prompt will effectively suit all participants. This paper offers new research into the use of image in large-scale referenced-based narrative writing assessments over a 10-year period in Australia reporting on phase one of a comparative case study. Findings identify changes in prompt design and content each year, with significant changes accompanying the introduction of the National Writing Assessment in 2008. Conclusions drawn from the analysis state that while image is a powerful communicator of meaning, providing visual representations in national assessment plan for literacy and numeracy may privilege some participants over others, and in doing so, impact on student outcomes and contribute to stratifying disadvantage

Disadvantage · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Literacy · Meaning (existential · Narrative · Pedagogy · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Privilege (computing · Sociology · Visual arts · Art Education and Development · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Literacy, Media, and Education · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Assessing multimodal literacies in practice

    Lynde Tan, Katina Zammit et al.•Language and Education•2020

  • Nature immersions

    Open Access•Katherine Bates•Australian Journal of Environmental…•2023

  • Visual Meaning

    Carey Jewitt, Rumiko Oyama•The Handbook of Visual Analysis•2004

  • Narratives in Popular Culture, Media, and Everyday Life

    Arthur Asa Berger, Arthur Berger•Narratives in Popular Culture,…•1997

  • Semiotics

    Daniel Chandler•Semiotics•2007

  • Multimodality

    Gunther Kress, Gunther R Kress•Multimodality•2009

  • Reading Images

    Gunther Kress, Teho Van Leeuwen et al.•Reading Images•2006

  • An Introduction to Functional Grammar

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Introduction to Functional Grammar•2014

  • Narrative Analysis

    William Labov, Joshua Waletzky•Journal of Narrative and Life…•1997

  • Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA)

    Open Access•Kay L O’halloran•Visual Communication•2008

  • Reading visual narratives

    Songjing Chen•Social Semiotics•2014

  • High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control

    Open Access•Wayne Au•Educational Researcher•2007

  • The Handbook of Visual Analysis

    T Van Leeuwen, Carey Jewitt•The Handbook of Visual Analysis•2004

  • The Notion of Context

    K Young•Western Folklore•1985

  • The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis

    Open Access•Charles Forceville, Charles J Forceville•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2023 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae