Framing China in the Pacific Islands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12347803 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Wallis (0000-0002-8767-917X, The University of Adelaide, corresponding author), Angus Ireland (The University of Adelaide), I M Robinson (The University of Adelaide), Isabel Robinson (The University of Adelaide), Alicia Turner (0000-0003-0048-6250, The University of Adelaide) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 522-545 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal Of International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1035-7718 • E-ISSN: 1465-332X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10357718.2022.2063252 |
| OpenAlex | W4223495253 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 27 |
How did many Australians come to accept that competition, rather than cooperation, with China was necessary in the Pacific Islands? We use discourse analysis techniques to examine the role that framings in Australian official discourse, media, and commentary over the last decade (2011–2021) played in constructing China’s presence in the region as threatening such that many Australians have accepted that policies aimed at competing with China are the most reasonable foreign and strategic policy response. We find that Australian official discourse was characterised by qualified optimism about China’s role until 2018, when a more explicit emphasis on competition emerged. Echoing this shift, while the media and (much of) the commentary framed China’s role in terms of threat and competition throughout the decade, this framing increased significantly in 2018. It is impossible to isolate the Australian government’s policy approach to China in the Pacific Islands from its broader understanding of China’s increasingly activist role in Australia, the Indo-Pacific, and globally. But our findings suggest that, by consistently framing China in terms of threat and competition, the media and – to a lesser extent, commentary – created an enabling environment for the public to accept changes to the Australian government’s policies
Archaeology · China · Framing (construction · Geography · Political science · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · International Maritime Law Issues · Island Studies and Pacific Affairs · Law
Audiences, contexts, and cues
The 'Tilt' and the 'Pacific Uplift' in 'Global Britain's' ties with the Pacific Islands
Between market and state
Between tides
Our region is now a strategic theatre’
Explaining sender–receiver gaps in signalling
Maintaining influence through economic statecraft
From “them” to “us
The enclosure and exclusion of Australia's 'Pacific family
Tā, Vā, and Lā
Images of China in the Australian press
Passports, Prosperity and Problems
Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research
Dragon versus Elephant
C hinese Assistance in the Pacific
China-Pacific Island Countries Strategic Partnership
China’s motives, influence and prospects in Pacific Island countries
Local Agency and Complex Power Shifts in the Era of Belt and Road
Trading with the Dragon
Engaging China’s new foreign policy in the South Pacific
China and the emerging regional order in the South Pacific
The ‘arc of instability’ and Australia's strategic policy
Contradictions in Australia's Pacific Islands discourse
China in the South Pacific
China–Taiwan diplomatic competition and the Pacific Islands
Why cooperate with others? Demystifying China's trilateral aid cooperation
China in Pacific Regional Politics
Water dragon? China, power shifts and soft balancing in the South Pacific
Rising Chinese Influence in the South Pacific
Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics
Foreign Policy as Social Construction
Australian foreign policy and news media
Framing
China's Rise in Oceania
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |