The 2000–01 Presidential Transition
Planning, Goals and Reality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12378005 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clay Johnson (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 51-53 |
| Publication date | 2002-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096502000136 |
| OpenAlex | W2014398168 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The circumstances of the 2000–2001 presidential transition will never be repeated, or at least I hope not for the sake of all concerned. Nevertheless, what we planned and what actually happened are highly relevant to future transition efforts. Most observers agree that the Bush-Cheney Administration got off to a strong start in large part because it made good use of the time available to it during the abbreviated transition period. Understanding this may help future presidents-elect plan their own transitions
Administration (probate law · Aesthetics · Period (music · Plan (archaeology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Public relations · Sociology · Transition (genetics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2005 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |