An Incremental Approach to Presidential Nomination Reform
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12379412 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William G Mayer (Universidad del Noreste, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 65-69 |
| Publication date | 2009-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096509090076 |
| OpenAlex | W2151773446 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
In a book published four years ago, Andrew Busch and I divided proposals to reform the presidential nomination process into two categories, which we called comprehensive and incremental (see Mayer and Busch 2004, chapter 5). Like any attempt to classify a complex reality, this distinction blurs a bit at the edges, but the basic idea should be clear. Comprehensive proposals call for major, far-reaching changes in the basic operations of the presidential nomination process; incremental proposals make more limited, marginal changes in the rules, while retaining the fundamental structure of the existing system
Law and economics · Nomination · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Process (computing · Programming language · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.24 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2010 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |