The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6319728 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen J Wayne (0000-0001-8997-7034, Georgetown University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 846-847 |
| Publication date | 2004-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592704410585 |
| OpenAlex | W2163569672 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations. By William G. Mayer and Andrew E. Busch. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2004. 226p. $49.95 cloth, $22.95 paper. The authors are right, but ... Front-loading has skewed the nomination process. It has given states holding early caucuses and primaries an advantage. They have more influence on the final outcome, more attention from the candidates and the news media, more economic benefit from the spending of the campaigns and the organizations that cover them, and more citizen involvement and higher voting turnout
Cover (algebra · Economics · Front (military · Front cover · Institution · Microeconomics · Nomination · Outcome (game theory · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Turnout · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Law · Public Administration
Interparty Differences in Elite Support for Presidential Nomination Candidates
Reforming Presidential Nominations
Meaningful Participation and the Evolution of the Reformed Presidential Nominating System
Packed primaries and empty caucuses
Primary Instability Paradox
The Front-Runner Falls
The Political Geography of Campaign Finance
An Incremental Approach to Presidential Nomination Reform
Polls and Elections
Presidential candidates nobody wants
An Unconfident Public
Two Parties, Two Types of Nominees, Two Paths to Winning a Presidential Nomination, 1972‐2004
Following the Money
Explaining the Decision to Withdraw from a U.S. Presidential Nomination Campaign
The Viability Primary
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2023 (18) |
| Highly cited | No |