Deepening Understanding in Qualitative Inquiry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12392135 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan Kerwin-Boudreau (Champlain College-Saint-Lambert), Lynn Butler-Kisber (McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Publication date | 2016-05-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-0147 • E-ISSN: 2160-3715 |
| Publisher | Nova Southeastern University (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2623 |
| OpenAlex | W2477787022 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 4 |
In this paper the authors describe how the use of multiple methods of qualitative data collection over a two-year period, including interviews, concept maps and journals, and the analysis of data through visual inquiry, categorizing (constant comparison thematic analysis), and connecting (narrative analysis) provided a more comprehensive understanding of the process of evolution in college teachers’ perspectives on teaching and learning within a professional development program than would have emerged with only a single method . Concept maps provided an initial visual footprint of teachers’ emerging perspectives. Categorization revealed four major patterns across teachers’ perspectives. Connecting the data through narrative summaries exposed a contextualized rendition of aspects of individual teachers’ perspectives. Each of these three approaches offers a unique lens into qualitative data analysis, and when used together, they clarify important aspects of the phenomenon under investigation
Categorization · Data collection · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Narrative · Narrative inquiry · Pedagogy · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Digital Storytelling and Education · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2022 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |