Reflecting on Caqdas and Ethics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12393410 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catarina Brandão (0000-0002-4305-5605, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author), António Pedro Costa (0000-0002-4644-5879, University of Aveiro), António Costa (0000-0003-3316-5605, University of Aveiro) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-0147 • E-ISSN: 2160-3715 |
| Publisher | Nova Southeastern University (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4767 |
| OpenAlex | W3112603111 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
As the use of Computer-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) becomes recurrent in qualitative research, researchers who use this methodological approach need to consider how ethical issues present themselves when we use these types of tools. In this introductory text to the Special Issue of The Qualitative Report, we identify and discuss some of the ethical aspects that we believe are interconnected with CAQDAS. By doing so, we hope to contribute to the reflection on these aspects and the definition of a praxis regarding ethical procedures when using a CAQDAS
Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Management science · Praxis · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |