The mediating role of national identification, binding foundations and perceived threat on the relationship between need for cognitive closure and prejudice against migrants in Malta
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12397100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fleur Bianco (0000-0001-9572-0294, Department of Social and Developmental Psychology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy, corresponding author), Ankica Kosic (0000-0003-0114-1879, Department of Social and Developmental Psychology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy), Antonio Pierro (0000-0003-3847-2241, Department of Social and Developmental Psychology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 172-185 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/casp.2559 |
| OpenAlex | W3178324910 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 64 |
What mitigates the relationship between need for cognitive closure and prejudice against migrants? Addressing this question, we explored how national identification, endorsing binding moral foundations and the perception of threat mediate the relationship between need for cognitive closure and prejudice against migrants in Malta. It was hypothesized that individuals with a high need for cognitive closure are more prone to identify with being Maltese and more probable to endorse binding moral foundations and perceive high threat from migrants, leading to a more prejudiced attitude towards migrants living in Malta. Two hundred and twenty‐two individuals participated in this quantitative study. Results from this study showed that national identification, binding moral foundations and perceived threat mediate the relationship between need for cognitive closure and prejudice against migrants. The implications of the findings for theories about how need for cognitive closure contributes to increased prejudiced attitude in native population is discussed. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement
Attribution · Closure (psychology · Cognition · Identification (biology · Maltese · Perception · Political science · Population · Prejudice (legal term · Sociology · Cultural Differences and Values · Law · Psychology · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge
The Moral Foundations taxonomy
Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation
Groups as epistemic providers
The Moral Ties That Bind . . . Even to Out-Groups
Cognition and Affect in Stereotyping
Surveying the Moral Landscape
Motivated closing of the mind
Inter‐ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice
Moral Dichotomization at the Heart of Prejudice
The Motivated Gatekeeper of Our Minds
Nationalism and patriotism
Prejudice Toward Immigrants 1
Blatant and subtle prejudice
Social Desirability of Subtle and Blatant Prejudice Scales
The Global Refugee Crisis
Stereotypic morality
Threat as justification of prejudice
Bad times are not good times for revolutions
The Trials of Women Leaders in the Workforce
National Identification And Anti-Immigrant Prejudice
Motivated prejudice
Tracing the threads
From prejudice to discrimination
Prejudice in person memory
Who We Are and Who Can Join Us
Contemporary Immigration Policy Orientations Among Dominant‐Group Members in Western Europe
Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice
A new threat in the air
Motivated Social Cognition
Intuitive ethics
Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe
Understanding Responses to Political Conflict
Political Conservatism, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Intergroup Hostility
A Longitudinal Test of the Model of Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition
Individual differences in need for cognitive closure
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations
Prejudice and politics
Membership has its (epistemic) rewards
Mapping the moral domain
Intergroup Bias
Group-level self-definition and self-investment
Whites' opposition to busing
The Psychology of Prejudice
The Sources and Consequences of National Identification
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory
When Morality Opposes Justice
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |