Ruskin, Darwin, and Looking Beneath Surfaces
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12411017 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katelin Krieg (Twin Cities Orthopedics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 709-726 |
| Publication date | 2017-11-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Victorian Literature and Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1060-1503 • E-ISSN: 1470-1553 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1060150317000171 |
| OpenAlex | W2767292265 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 25 |
John Ruskin and Charles Darwin shared a desire to change the way their readers looked at both nature and art. However, when considering them together, we typically remember their failure to see eye to eye on man's place in nature. Examining Ruskin's responses to Darwin's work, sexual selection in particular, or Ruskin's late dissatisfaction with Victorian science more generally, scholars have emphasized their conflicting worldviews. Yet this tendency to focus on conceptual disagreement fails to consider a shared intellectual background between the two men: the science of geology
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Charles darwin · Darwin (ADL · Darwinism · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Sociology · Historical Art and Culture Studies · History · Joseph Conrad and Literature · Philosophy · Travel Writing and Literature
Thought experiments in science and philosophy
Time's arrow, time's cycle
Bursting the Limits of Time
Darwin's Plots
Illuminating illusions, or, the Victorian art of seeing things
Charles Darwin and Victorian Visual Culture
The Circles of Vitality”
Ruskin and His “Good Master,” William Buckland
Visions of Science
Genesis and Geology
The Literate Eye
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |