Iranian Nuclear Aspirations and Strategic Balancing in the Middle East

With a few notable exceptions, \n1 it has become almost conventional wisdom to assume that a \nnuclear Iran is bad for its immediate neighbors, the wider Middle East region, and even the \nworld.2 Such logic suggests that even an Iran with a nascent nuclear program would be \nemboldened in its meddling in Middle Eastern geopolitical affairs, present a serious, perhaps \nexistential, threat to Israel and others, and could potentially lead to a nuclear-proliferation \ncascade among its immediate regional rivals. There is almost certainly some truth to these \nclaims — and few people see an Iran armed with nuclear weapons as a good thing or \nsomething that should be welcomed. That said, much of the current debate has ignored or \nglossed over some of the other important geopolitical dynamics that have been driven by \nIranian actions during the past decade: actions that have in fact been broadly positive for \nregional security and stability. As a result, if a comprehensive deal on the nuclear programme \ncannot be reached by the June 30 deadline, the strategic implications of latent or even a \nnuclear-armed Iran may not be as catastrophic as some have suggested and more subtle than \nmany fear

Citation · Doctoral dissertation · Library science · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Computer Science · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Socioeconomic Development in MENA