Is Living Easier With Eyes Closed
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12416614 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charlotte Wien (0000-0002-3257-2084, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | S1 |
| Pages | S63-S74 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1062-7987 • E-ISSN: 1474-0575 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1062798723000558 |
| OpenAlex | W4390749035 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 20 |
Blind peer review has become the gold standard of many scholarly disciplines. However, this seems like a paradox since openness is deeply embedded in the DNA of research. Over the last 30 years changes in the managerial paradigms of academia have also induced so many changes in the ecosystem of scholarly communication that many scholars describe the present situation as a crisis. Therefore, in light of the availability of new technologies and the changes in the scholarly communication ecosystems, it might be time to review how we assess research quality and address the paradox of the blindness of peer review
Blindness · Business · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Internet privacy · Openness to experience · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Engineering · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Social Psychology · Optometry
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |